Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Mithanagar Shri Chintamani Chs Ltd vs S.D.Construction And Anr on 17 June, 2019

Author: G.S.Kulkarni

Bench: G.S. Kulkarni

  pvr                                     1               11carbp539-17.doc


                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                      ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

           COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 539 OF 2017

 Mithanagar Shri.Chintamani CHS Ltd.            ...Petitioner
        Versus
 1.S.D.Construction & Ors.                      ...Respondents
                                 -----
 Ms.Shweta Merchant with Bhushan Bhatia I/b. Solicis Lex, for the
 Petitioner.

 Mr.P.D.Dalvi ib. Ajit Kocharekar, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

                                      -----
                               CORAM : G.S. KULKARNI, J.
                               DATE   :     17 June 2019
                                          ---
 P.C.

1. Leave to amend to implead Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) and Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai (MCGM) as party respondents. Amendment be carried out during the course of the day.

2. MHADA and the Municipal Corporation are directed to consider the issues which are involved in this petition and more particularly when it is an admitted fact that the members of the society are occupying the building in question since 2008 without an 'Occupation Certificate' being granted by the Municipal Corporation. MHADA has also raised a concern ::: Uploaded on - 24/06/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 14/07/2019 01:37:18 ::: pvr 2 11carbp539-17.doc in this regard by letter dated 22 February 2019 bearing outward no.Ka.A/go.vi./Mu.M./524/19. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would not dispute that the members of the petitioner are occupying the building since 2008. The petitioner-society has now prayed for certain reliefs in this petition against the respondent who is stated to be a developer, which are diverse reliefs which read as under:-

(a) that pending the arbitration/invocation of arbitration proceedings and till the implementation of Arbitration Award, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the Respondents to comply with the statutory obligations under MOFA and procure the Occupation Certificate and Building Completion Certificate in a time bound manner.
(b) that pending the arbitration /invocation of arbitration proceedings and till the implementation of Arbitration Award, the Respondents, their servants and agents be directed to comply with the obligations under the Development Agreement dated 22 nd February,2003 and Memorandum of Understanding dated 22 November,2010 in a time bound manner;
(c) that pending the arbitration/ invocation of arbitration proceedings and till the implementation of Arbitration Award, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the Respondents to execute Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements with each member of the Petitioner Society; entirely at the cost and expenses of the Respondents;
(d) that pending the hearing and disposal of the Arbitration Petition, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the Respondent to pay
(i) Rs.61,80,519/ towards the outstanding water/sewerage charges payable to the Statutory Authorities/Corporation;
(ii) Rs.2,60,790/- towards the property taxes payable to the Statutory Authorities/Corporation;
(iii) Rs.2,48,832/- towards the outstanding charges payable to the Statutory Authorities for the water utilized during the period of construction by the Respondent.
::: Uploaded on - 24/06/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 14/07/2019 01:37:18 :::
   pvr                                         3                 11carbp539-17.doc

                  (e)     that pending the heareing and disposal of the Arbitration
Petition, the Respondents, their servants and agents be directed by an order of this Hon'ble Court to hand over the Original Conveyance Deed, Original Property Card, Approved plans, sanction and any other documents in the custody and possession of the Respondent to the Petitioner Society in a time bound manner;
(f) that pending the hearing and disposal of the Arbitration Petition, Respondent's its Directors/partners/officers, agents, servants be directed to Disclose on oath all documentation, approvals, sanctions and other correspondences in respect of the said project so submitted to various authorities for approval;
(g) that pending the hearing and disposal of the Arbitration Petition, Respondent its Directors/ partners/ officers/ agents, servants be directed to disclose on oath all the details of development agreements so entered into by the Respondent with third parties in the last 10 years and the breaches committed by the respondent qua the Sale Deeds/Agreements/ Permanent Accommodation Agreements/ Development Agreement, status of all projects undertaken by the Respondent its partners/ proprietor jointly or with association with third parties, including the exact consideration so received towards the sale of flats in the free sale category and the exact civil and criminal cases pending against the Respondents;
(h) Pending the hearing and final disposal of the present Petition/ arbitration proceedings, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to appoint a Court Commissioner/Architect to inspect the said project and submit a report as to the status of construction, illegalities in construction and exact nature of approvals and sanctions required to be procured for regularization/legality of the project and other breaches in respect of the said Project qua the Development Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding to this Hon'ble Court in a time bound manner."

3. The respondents have appeared and placed on record a reply affidavit to state that the members of the petitioner are illegally occupying the building in question/respective tenements and after having occupied without any authority in law, the members have committed several acts ::: Uploaded on - 24/06/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 14/07/2019 01:37:18 ::: pvr 4 11carbp539-17.doc and have made additions and alterations to the respective flats and which are contrary to the sanctioned/approved plans. It is submitted this being a situation of illegal alteration as made by the members of the petitioner, then the respondents cannot be held liable for any lapses. It is submitted that the respondents were always ready and willing to hand over plans to the petitioners and the same would be handed over to the petitioner as per order dated 14 February 2019 passed by this Court, within one week from today. Statement is accepted.

4. Prima facie it is quite serious and objectionable that the members of the petitioner have occupied the building in question without a completion certificate/occupation certificate being granted by the statutory authorities. It is also surprising that although the authorities are aware that the members of the petitioner are illegally occupying the tenements, no steps have been taken against those occupants who are illegally occupying the premises. All these issues are required to be gone into as noted above and the MHADA and the Municipal Corporation are required to be heard on these issues.

5. Accordingly, issue notice to MHADA and Municipal Corporation returnable on 24 June 2019. High on Board. In addition to Court notice, Advocate for the petitioner is permitted to serve the notice on the Law ::: Uploaded on - 24/06/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 14/07/2019 01:37:18 ::: pvr 5 11carbp539-17.doc Officers of the MHADA and the Municipal Corporation, alongwith the copies of all the pleadings including the petition and copies of the affidavits.

6. Needless to observe that in the above circumstances, the members of the society shall occupy their respective premises at their own risk and consequences. In the event of any unfortunate incidence, the members of the society shall not hold the Municipal Corporation or MHADA or the respondent-developer responsible and shall not have any claim against them. The parties are further put to notice that the legal consequence of such illegal occupation by the respective parties, is eviction of these persons, till the construction is regularised and/or certified fit for occupancy, then the Corporation may be called upon to take appropriate measures, till the premises are declared fit for human habitation, and that there is no danger to the life and property of the persons residing in the said building. Ordered accordingly.

7. Stand over 24 June 2019. High On board.

(G.S.Kulkarni, J.) ::: Uploaded on - 24/06/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 14/07/2019 01:37:18 :::