Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Pratap Das @ Pao vs Unknown on 3 March, 2025

Author: Debangsu Basak

Bench: Debangsu Basak

 03.03.2025
  Item No.16
Monthly List
 Court No.26
  Allowed
   CHC                         CRM (DB) 4374 of 2024

                In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of
                Criminal Procedure, 1973/ under Section 483 of Bharatiya
                Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Bankura
                Police Station Case No. 310 of 2023 dated 05.09.2023 under
                Sections 326/307/120B of the Indian Penal Code and under
                Sections 25(1)(a)/27 of the Arms Act.
                                        -And-

               In the matter of : Pratap Das @ Pao
                                                                ... ... Petitioner


               Mr. Ayan Basu, Advocate
               Sk. Salim, Advocate
               Mr. Sumit Routh, Advocate
                               ... ... For the Petitioner

               Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, Ld. A.P.P.
               Mr. Ranadeb Sengupta, Advocate
               Mrs. Debjani Sahu, Advocate
                            ... ...For the State

               1.

Petitioner prays for bail on the ground of parity with the coaccused who was enlarged on bail by the coordinate Bench on February 24, 2025 passed on CRM(DB) 66 of 2025.

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State submits that, the petitioner cannot be placed on same footing as that of such coaccused. He submits that, there are 11 criminal antecedents so far as the petitioner is concerned. At least for of them involved in Arms Act. Petitioner is a contract killer. The vehicle used in the crime as also the offending weapon was also recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Eyewitness testimony implicates the petitioner in the incident of murder.

2

3. We perused the order of the coordinate Bench dated February 24, 2025 passed in CRM(DB) 66 of 2025.

4. Relevant portion of the order of the coordinate Bench is as follows:-

"5. Hence, without touching the merits of the case and solely on the ground of delay in progress of the trial and considering the period of detention of the petitioner, we feel impelled to allow his prayer for bail."

5. Therefore, in our view, the relevant consideration of the coordinate Bench was delay in progress of the trial and period of detention, without the merits being considered, so far as the coaccused is concerned.

6. Coaccused was seen to be shooting the victim.

7. Petitioner is in custody for a period in excess of coaccused who was enlarged on bail by the coordinate Bench.

8. There is hardly any progress of the trial since the order of the coordinate Bench dated February 24, 2025.

9. In such circumstances, we grant bail to the petitioner.

10. Accordingly, we direct that the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bankura, subject to condition that the petitioner shall appear before the learned trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate 3 witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

11. In the event, the petitioner fails to comply with the conditions as enshrined hereinbefore, it is open to the trial court to cancel the bail without further reference to this Court.

12. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.

13. CRM(DB) 4374 of 2024 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)