Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi

Ramesh Chand Kapoor, L/H Of Late Sh. ... vs Ito, Ward-58(2), New Delhi on 1 April, 2019

                 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                      DELHI BENCH: 'SMC' NEW DELHI

             BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                         I.T.A .No.-6059/Del/2018
                       (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2010-11)

      Ramesh Chand Kapoor                    vs ITO
      L/H of Late Sh. Rohit Kapoor,             Ward 58(2),
      F-182-AA, Mangal Bazar,                   New Delhi.
      Laxmi Nagar,
      Delhi.
      PAN No. AOKPK6279K                       (RESPONDENT)

      (APPELLANT)
            Appellant by             None
            Respondent by            Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr. DR

                      Date of Hearing              28/03/2019
                   Date of Pronouncement           01/04/2019

                                      ORDER

This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the Order dated 03/08/2018 of the Ld. CIT(A)-19, New Delhi relevant to assessment year 2010-11.

2. In this case the Notice was sent to the assessee for hearing i.e. on 28/03/2019 at the address mentioned in Form No. 36 vide Column No. 10.

3. On 28/03/2019, neither the assessee nor his Authorized Representative attended the hearing and also not filed any Application for adjournment or nor filed the fresh address before the Tribunal, hence, I am of the view that no useful purpose would be served to serve the notice again and again on the same address. In ITA No. 6059/D/2018 2 view of above, it is thus inferred that the assessee is not interested in prosecution of his Appeal.

4. Having regard to Rule 19(2) of the ITAT Rules and following various decisions of Delhi Bench of the Tribunal including that of Multiplan India Ltd. : 38 ITD 320 (Delhi) and Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court's decision in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT; 223 ITR 480 (MP), I treat this appeal as un-admitted and dismiss the same. I would like to clarify that subsequently, if the assessee explains the reasons for non appearance and if the Bench is so satisfied, the matter may be recalled for the purpose of adjudication of the Appeal.

5. In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is dismissed in limine.

Order pronounced on 01.04.2019.

Sd/-

                                                             (H.S. SIDHU)
                                                       JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated:    01/04/2019
*Kavita

Copy forwarded to:
1. Appellant
2. Respondent
3. CIT
4. CIT(Appeals)
5. DR: ITAT

                                              ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
                                                   ITAT, NEW DELHI
                        ITA No. 6059/D/2018              3




                                             Date
1.    Draft dictated on                      28/03/19
2.    Draft placed before author             28/03/19

3. Draft proposed & placed before the second member

4. Draft discussed/approved by Second 01/04 Member.

5. Approved Draft comes to the 01/04 Sr.PS/PS

6. Order Pronounced and Uploaded 01/04

7. File sent to the Bench Clerk 01/04

8. Date on which file goes to the AR

9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk.

10. Date of dispatch of Order.