Chattisgarh High Court
State Bar Council Of Chhattisgarh vs Commissioner Of Income Tax And Ors. 18 ... on 4 April, 2018
Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal
Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (T) No.217 of 2009
State Bar Council of Chhattisgarh, A body corporate under Section 5 of
the Advocates Act, 1961, situated at High Court Premises, Bilaspur (C.G.)
through its officer on Special Duty and officiating secretary, V.A.
Narayanan.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(1), Aaykar Bhavan,
Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur (C.G.)
2. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bilaspur (C.G.), Aaykar Bhavan, Vyapar
Vihar, Bilaspur (C.G.)
3. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (C.G.), New Central Revenue
Building, Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.)
4. Central Board of Direct Taxes, through Secretary, North Block, New
Delhi.
5. Union of India, through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of
Revenue, North Block, New Delhi
6. Director General of Income Tax (Exemption), Plot No. 15, II Floor, Laxmi
Nagar, District Centre, New Delhi
---- Respondents
For Petitioner: Mr. Neelabh Dubey, Advocate. For Respondents No.1 to 4 and 6: -
Mr. Amit Choudhary, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 04/04/2018
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition is filed for refund of recovered amount and that has already been refunded.
Therefore, the petition has become infructuous.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to cost(s).
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma