Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt Anuradha vs M/S Karnataka State Industrial And on 21 February, 2023

Author: S Sunil Dutt Yadav

Bench: S Sunil Dutt Yadav

                                                  -1-
                                                         WP No. 23765 of 2022




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                        DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
                                            BEFORE
                        THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
                        WRIT PETITION NO. 23765 OF 2022 (GM-CPC)
                   BETWEEN:

                   1.    SMT ANURADHA
                         D/O LATE S RAMACHAR
                         W/O V.R.NAGABUSHAN
                         AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
                         R/AT NO.23, 9TH CROSS,
                         ITI LAYOUT,
                         J.P. NAGAR 1ST PHASE,
                         BENGALURU-560 078

                                                                ... PETITIONER

                   (BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR K., ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.    M/S KARNATAKA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND
Digitally signed         INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
by VIJAYA P              CORPORATION LTD.,
Location: High           REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
Court of                 OF COMPANIES ACT, 1956,
Karnataka                EARLIER KNOWN AS
                         KARNATAKA STAE INDUSTRIAL
                         INVESTMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
                         CORPORATION LTD.,

                         KHANIJA BHAVAN, NO.49,
                         4TH FLOOR, EAST WING,
                         RACE COURSE ROAD,
                         BENGALURU-560 001
                         REPTD BY ITS MANAGER (LEGAL)
                               -2-
                                    WP No. 23765 of 2022




2.   M/S. FLORA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
     NO.376/35, 6TH CROSS,
     WILSON GOARDEN
     BENGLAURU-560 027.
     REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF
     COMPANIES ACT, 1956
     REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR
     SRI M.S.A. ALEEM

3.   SRI.M.S.A ALEEM
     S/O M.SYED ABBAS
     MAJOR
     R/AT NO.36, 2ND CROSS,
     D COSTA SQUARE,
     COOKE TOWN
     BENGLAURU-560 087.

4.   SRI.M.S.C PASHA
     S/O SYED ABBAS,
     MAJOR,

     RESPONDENT NOS.3 AND 4
     ARE RESIDING AT
     R/AT NO.36, 2ND CROSS,
     D COSTA SQUARE,
     COOKE TOWN
     BENGLAURU-560 087.

5.   M/S. FLORA SILKS LIMITED
     NO.376/35, 6TH CROSS,
     WILSON GARDEN,
     BENGALURU-560 027
     REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF
     THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956,
     REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
     SRI.M.S.A ALEEM.

                                         ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. VIVEKANANDA T P., ADVOCATE FOR R1)
                                 -3-
                                             WP No. 23765 of 2022




     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH/ SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 15.10.2022, IN COM.EX.NO.
164/2021, PASSED BY THE 10TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, (COMMERCIAL COURT) BENGALURU RURAL
DISTRICT AT BENGALURU, (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC.

    THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                           ORDER

The petitioner files a memo enclosing a copy of One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal along with a letter dated 15.02.2023.

2. It is submitted that the OTS proposal of the petitioner has been accepted by the KSIIDC/respondent No.1 herein.

3. Learned counsel appearing for KSIIDC submits that it is a indeed fact that OTS of the petitioner has been accepted.

4. Accordingly, in light of the stand of the respondents as having accepted the OTS proposal of the petitioner, all proceedings insofar as the petitioner is -4- WP No. 23765 of 2022 concerned before the Executing Court in Com.Ex.No.164/2021 shall stand closed and the property of the petitioner, if attached would now revert with full rights to the petitioner.

5. Accordingly, petition is disposed off as not requiring any adjudication, in light of satisfaction of the claim against the petitioner. Consequently, all proceedings before the Executing Court insofar as the property of the petitioner would stand terminated.

Needless to state this would not come in the way of proceedings as regards other judgment debtors in the pending proceedings.

Sd/-

JUDGE PN