Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Gujarat High Court

Baboo Ram Hari Chand Office At 2114 vs Union Of India & on 1 April, 2013

Author: Ravi R.Tripathi

Bench: Ravi R.Tripathi

  
	 
	 BABOO RAM HARI CHAND OFFICE AT 2114,KHARI BAOLI,....Petitioner(s)V/SUNION OF INDIA
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 


	C/SCA/204/2011
	                                                                    
	                           ORDER

 

 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

IN
			THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
		
	

 


 


 


SPECIAL CIVIL
APPLICATION  NO. 204 of 2011
 


with
 


SPECIAL CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 3031 of 2011
 

================================================================
 


BABOO RAM HARI CHAND OFFICE
AT 2114,KHARI BAOLI,....Petitioner(s)
 


Versus
 


UNION OF INDIA  & 
3....Respondent(s)
 

================================================================
 

Appearance:
 

MR
AMAR D MITHANI, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
 

MR
HRIDAY BUCH, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1
 

MR
PS CHAMPANERI, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 3
 

MR
RJ OZA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 2 - 4
 

MR
VH KANARA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1
 

NOTICE
SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 2 , 4
 

================================================================
 

 


 


	 
		  
		 
		  
			 
				 

CORAM:
				
				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI
			
		
		 
			 
				 

 

				
			
			 
				 

and
			
		
		 
			 
				 

 

				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				MR.JUSTICE R.D.KOTHARI
			
		
	

 


 

 


Date : 01/04/2013
 


 		ORAL ORDER ON

SPEAKING TO MINUTES (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The matters are notified on filing Speaking to Minutes by the learned advocate for the petitioner in Special Civil Applications.

The learned advocate invited the attention of the Court to the fact that the matters were adjourned to 9.4.2013, but, inadvertently, in the order, the date of adjournment is mentioned as 19.4.2013. The date of adjournment is accordingly corrected. Registry is directed to notify these matters on 9.4.2013.

(RAVI R.TRIPATHI, J.) (R.D.KOTHARI, J.)l Page 2 of 2