Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Metronation Chennai Television ... vs Yupptv Inc on 21 June, 2019

Author: Krishnan Ramasamy

Bench: Krishnan Ramasamy

                                                       1



                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                             DATED : 21.06.2019

                                                     CORAM

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

                                      C.S.(COMM.DIV)No.670 of 2018
                                      and O.A.Nos.919 to 921 of 2019

                      Metronation Chennai Television Private Limited
                      #86, EVK Sampath Road
                      Vepery
                      Chennai-600007
                      Tamil Nadu
                      Represented by its Chief Operating Officer
                      Mr.J.Prasannajothi                   ...         Plaintiff

                                                            Vs.

                      1.YuppTV Inc.
                        #11175 Cicero Drive
                        Suite 100, Alpharetta
                        GA-30022, USA
                        Represented by its Chief Executive Officer
                        & Director
                        Mr.Udayanandan Reddy

                      2. YuppTV India Private Limited
                         No.8-2-293/82/A/773,
                         Road No.44, CBI Colony
                         Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500033,
                         Telangana, India

                      Also having address at-

                      #38-40, Plot No.3,
                      IonIdea Building, EPIP Area,


http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                2



                      Bengaluru-560066,
                      Karnataka, India
                      Represented by its Managing Director
                      Mr.Uday Nandan Reddy                                   ...        Defendants




                      PRAYER: Plaint under Order IV, Rule 1 of O.S.Rules, Read with
                      Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C. Read with Sections 134 &135 of the
                      Trade Marks Act, 1999; Sections 37 & 62 of the CopyRight Act,
                      1957, praying for a Judgment and Decree against the defendants
                      (a) Granting Permanent injunction restraining the Defendants by
                      themselves, their agents, associates, representatives, assigns or
                      men, or anyone claiming through them from in any manner
                      infringing   the    Plaintiff's   Trade       Mark     "THANTHI        TV"     bearin
                      registration No.2320588 in respect of Telecommunications, satellite
                      cable and Direct to Home Television broadcasting services for their
                      services including on YUPP TV or any other avenue via electronics,
                      satellite, print in any manner, form or means including through
                      internet connected devices, android devices, smart TV's, Smart
                      Bluray players, set-top boxes, mobile handsets, smart phones,
                      gaming consoles, desktop-laptop computers, tablets and their
                      technological advancements whatsoever;


                      (B)Granting        PERMANENT          INJUNCTION                 restraining     the
                      Defendants         by    themselves,           their         agents,    associates,
                      representatives, assigns or men, or any claiming through them from
                      in any manner passing off the Defendants                        existence through



http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                               3



                      YUPP      TV   services    by    misappropriating        Plaintiff's   registered
                      trademark THANTHI TV, publication service and contents in any
                      manner or means whatsoever including by showing or make believe
                      a connection between the Plaintiff and the Defendants mark and
                      services in a manner as to lead the public to believe that
                      Defendants' YUPP TV is emanating or is in some way connected to
                      the Plaintiff's celebrated THANTHI TV;


                      (C)      Granting    PERMANENT           INJUNCTION           restraining        the
                      Defendants          by    themselves,          their    agents,        associates,
                      representatives, assigns or men, or anyone claiming through them
                      from in any manner infringing Plaintiff's copyright and/or
                      dealing with or exploiting Plaintiff's copyright in the contents of
                      THANTHI TV including works in the nature of text print, audio,
                      video,     photography,        images,       cartoon,    caricature,        debates,
                      interviews, moving images, cinematograph, picture, visual, sound
                      accompaniments, their excerptions; use of Plaintiff's THANTHI TV
                      content in part and/or as a whole' by any means indulge in telecast,
                      imitation, display, diffusion, copy, save, store, relay, replay, pause-
                      save for later viewing, through any process or technological
                      advancements        in   any    form   or     format    accessible     by    public,
                      consumers, via satellite, internet, set-top box, wi-fi, cable, wireless
                      diffusion,     software    applications,        tags    &    links,     electronic
                      contraptions, console, android devices, smart phones, mobile hands
                      sets, television, computer or other similar purpose functioning
                      devices and applications through YUPP TV or other communication



http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                4



                      platforms in/through any manner form, technological advancements
                      or means wahtsoever;


                      (D)    Granting    PERMANENT           INJUNCTION                  restraining   the
                      Defendants        by        themselves,        their      agents,       associates,
                      representatives, assigns or men, or any claiming through them from
                      in any manner infringing Plaintiff's broadcast reproduction
                      rights by dealing with or exploiting the contents of THANTHI TV
                      including   works      in    the   nature     of   text   print,     audio,   video,
                      photography, images, cartoon, caricature, debates, interviews,
                      moving images, sound accompaniments, their excerption, content in
                      part and/or as a whole, by any means, imitation, display, diffusion,
                      copy, process or technological advancements in any form or format
                      accessible by public, consumers, via satellite, internet,set-top
                      box,wi-fi, cable wireless diffusion, software applications, tags &
                      links, electronic contraptions, console, television, computer or other
                      similar purpose functioning devices and applications through YUPP
                      TV or other communication platforms in/through any manner, form,
                      technological advancements or means whatsoever;


                      (E)    Granting     PERMANENT             INJUNCTION           restraining       the
                      Defendants        by        themselves,        their      agents,       associates,
                      representatives, assigns or men, or anyone claiming through them
                      from    obstructing,         altering,        contaminating,         diminishing,
                      usurping, threatening normal operations of Plaintiff's THANTHI TV
                      and access to THANTHI TV media services in any manner, form or



http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                       5



                      means whatsoever;


                      (F) A Direction to the Defendants to render a true and faithful
                      account of the profits earned by it through the infringement of
                      Plaintiff's trade mark THANTHI TV and copyright in contents of
                      THANTHI TV as well as infringement of Broadcaster's rights of the
                      Plaintiff; submit details of subscriptions to YUPP TV, details of
                      advertisers & advertisements telecasted on THANTHI TV through
                      YUPP TV and money collected worldwide for accessing/subscribing
                      YUPP TV enabling public/customers of Defendants to access
                      THANTHI TV thereby; submit details of money earned from
                      advertisers for advertising, telecasting on THANTHI TV through
                      YUPP TV to the Plaintiff;


                      (G) A Direction to the Defendants to pay the Plaintiff as damages
                      all such illegal profits and money earned from - (i) the public
                      through subscription to YUPP TV that enabled public/customers of
                      the Defendants to access THANTHI TV through YUPP TV; and (ii) the
                      advertisers of the Defendants advertising on THANTHI TV through
                      YUPP TV unapproved and unknown to the Plaintiff;


                      (H) Directing the Defendants to pay to the Plaintiff the cost of the
                      suit.




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                     6



                              For Plaintiff      : Mr.Perumbulavil Radhakrishnan
                              For Defendants     : Mr.Keerthikiran Murali

                                               JUDGMENT

When the matter is taken up for hearing, a Memo of compromise dated 30.04.2019 has been filed on behalf of both the parties. The said Memo has been duly signed by both the parties and attested by their respective counsels. The terms of the Memo of Compromise reads as under:

"1. The Plaintiff and defendants have arrived at a compromise on the terms mentioned below and that the record of compromise constitute the part of the Judgment and Decree in the suit to be passed by this Honourable Court.
2. The defendants admit and acknowledge that Plaintiff is the sole and exclusive owner of the content on the Thanthi TV Channel which is utilized by the defendants. Further, the Plaintiff having represented that it is the sole and exclusive owner of the rights in the content telecast on Thanthi TV channel, Plaintiff agrees to grant a non-exclusive worldwide territory license except Middle East and North Africa (MENA http://www.judis.nic.in 7 Region) Territory to the Defendants for distribution of Thanthi TV channel content by way of OTT (Over the Top Platform) only till 29th April,2020. No License is granted to Defendants for distribution of Thanthi TV channel and its content in any form in the Territory of Middle East and North Africa (MENA Region) during the term.
3.The Defendants agree to pay to the Plaintiff a sum of Rs.55,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Five Lakhs only) approximately USD.78,570/- being compensation for the past usage and for the period of utilization of the Plaintiff's content of Thanthi TV till 29th April, 2020 in the following manner:
a. Rs.1,509,900 (USD 21,570/-) on signing these presents in April,2019.
b. Rs.1,050,000 (15,000 USD) on or before 15th May, 2019.
c. Rs.980,000 (14,000 USD) on or before 15th July, 2019.
d. Rs.980,000(14,000 USD) on or before 15th September, 2019.
e.Rs.980,000 (14,000 USD) on or before 15th December, 2019.
http://www.judis.nic.in 8 In the event of default of any one of the above instalments, the Plaintiff is entitled to claim interest from the defendants at a rate equal to the lesser of two percent (2%) per month and the maximum legal rate and the Defendants shall be restrained from further use of the Plaintiff's content. Such interest shall accrue from said due date and Defendants shall be liable for all reasonable legal costs and expenses incurred by Plaintiff in collecting any past due amounts.
4. The parties hereto are at consensus that the amount to be paid above and the period of utilisation shall be effective till 29th April, 2020 and that future licence free for the following year thereafter shall be decided based on mutual agreement between the parties and a licence agreement may be drawn and executed before expiry of the existing term period till 29th April, 2020, on such terms as the parties shall agree.
5.The Defendants agree to execute Licence Agreement in respect of the earlier period and for all future periods both in respect of licencing the content and use of Trade Mark along with requisite affidavit to be filed before the respective authorities. The Parties are at consensus that the defendants are not entitled to sub-distribute or delegate any right herein licenced to third parties, and the licence is non-transferable, http://www.judis.nic.in 9 provided however, the access and availability of the 'Yupp TV' application/service integrated or any other device/platform is permitted and shall not be deemed to be a sub-license or transfer of any right therein.
6. The Defendants have agreed that they shall not over-run any advertisement, edit (save to the extent required to comply with applicable laws(including without limitation censorship laws) in the worldwide territory) or alter, the content telecast by the Plaintiff on the Thanthi TV channel.
7. The Defendants having represented that they have the technical expertise to track pirated sites and agrees to help, to the extent commercially reasonable, the Plaintiff to track and pull down any such pirated sites portraying the plaintiff's Thanthi TV channel. The Plaintiff undertakes to execute such specified form of authorization, from time to time and as may be required under law, to enable the Defendants to carry out effective anti-piracy actions.
8.Both the parties agree that the terms of this memorandum of compromise is confidential and shall not be disclosed to third parties save and except as may be required by any law, http://www.judis.nic.in 10 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J arr rule, regulation, court order or governmental agency and except on a need to know basis to each party's employees, accountants, auditors, investors, lenders and legal counsel."

2. The learned counsel appearing on either side has submitted that the suit may be decreed in terms of Memo of Compromise.

3. Recording the Memo of Compromise dated 30.04.2019, this suit is decreed in terms of Joint Memo of Compromise. The Memo of Compromise shall form part of the decree. No costs. Consequently, connected Applications stands closed.

20.06.2019 arr C.S.(COMM.DIV)No.670 of 2018 and O.A.Nos.919 to 921 of 2019 http://www.judis.nic.in 11 http://www.judis.nic.in