Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Kalesh vs State Of Kerala on 25 October, 2013

Author: Harun-Ul-Rashid

Bench: Harun-Ul-Rashid

       

  

  

 
 
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                             PRESENT:

              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID

    WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2013/8TH KARTHIKA, 1935

                                   Crl.MC.No. 4963 of 2013
                                       ---------------------------
    AGAINST THE ORDER IN CRMP NO.1386/2013 OF
     SESSIONS COURT,PATHANAMTHITTA DATED 25-10-2013
                                            .....
CRIME NO.1420/2013 OF PATHANAMTHITTA POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA
                                            ........

    PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED NOS.1 & 2:
    --------------------------------------------------------------

   1. KALESH, AGED 29 YEARS,
      S/O. BHASKARAN, VADAKECHERIVIL, KULASEKAHARAPATHI,
      PATHANAMTHITTA.

   2. THULASIDAS, AGED 32 YEARS,
      VADAKECHERIVIL, KULASEKAHARAPATHI, PATHANAMTHITTA.

      BY ADV. SRI.C.P.SAJI

    RESPONDENT:COMPLAINANT:
    ----------------------------------------------------

      STATE OF KERALA,
      REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIE PROSECUTOR,
      HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 031.

      BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN


      THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
      ON 30-10-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
      FOLLOWING:

Kss

Crl.MC.No. 4963 of 2013
-----------------------------------

                                                   APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES:
---------------------------------------------

ANX.A1. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 25-10-2013 IN

            CRL. M.P. NO. 1386 OF 2013 OF THE SESSIONS COURT,

             PATHANAMTHITTA.


RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:
-----------------------------------------------        N I L




                                                                /TRUE COPY/


                                                                P.A.TO JUDGE

Kss



                      HARUN-UL-RASHID, J.
                     ---------------------------
                  Crl.M.C. No.4963 of 2013
                     --------------------------
          Dated this the 30th day of October 2013.

                            O R D E R

Petitioners are accused Nos.1 & 2 in crime No.1420/2013 of the Pathanamthitta Police Station. They filed the Crl.M.P. No. 1386/2013 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. The offence alleged are punishable under Sections 324 read with Section 34 of IPC and Section 25(1) of the Indian Arms Act.

2. The prosecution case is that on 29.9.2013 at about 8.30 p.m, due to previous enmity the defacto complainant has filed a criminal complaint before the Police against the petitioners and that in furtherance of their common intention, the 1st and 2nd accused attacked the defacto-complainant with prohibited arms like iron stick and sword stick and thereby the defacto complainant has sustained grievous injuries. Petitioners are in judicial custody. They were arrested on 25.9.2013 and 26.9.2013 respectively. The original bail application filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Pathanamthitta was dismissed on 3.10.2013. The petitioners moved Sessions Judge for bail. The said petition was also dismissed on 10.10.2013. Crl.M.C. No.4963/2013 : 2 :

3. Petitioner filed present CMP No.1368/2013 for bail. The court below after considering the entire facts and circumstances, held that no purpose would be served in keeping the petitioners behind the bars indefinitely. The bail was granted subject to several conditions.

4. Petitioners are aggrieved by condition No.1 to the extent the court directs the petitioner and sureties to produce the original title deed. Petitioners are also aggrieved by the direction that the petitioners shall not enter into Pathanamthitta village where the defacto complainant is residing except for the purpose of appearing before the Investigating Officer, until further orders.

5. Petitioners are coolie workers and are residing within the territorial area of the same village. It is submitted that petitioners have no house out side Pathanamthitta Village and the house of the petitioners are situated in the Lakshamveedu colony in Pathanamthitta Village. It is pointed out that directions issued not to enter into Pathanamthitta Village is highhanded, unjust and unreasonable. It is also submitted that the sureties are not in possession of their original title deeds. They have pledged their title deeds with financial institutions while they have availed loans and as such they were unable to produce the original deeds.

6. In the facts and circumstances noticed, this Court is inclined Crl.M.C. No.4963/2013 : 3 : to grant relief to the petitioners. The order dated 25.10.2013 is modified. The direction to produce the original title deeds and condition No.8 are deleted.

The Crl.M.C is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge.

AL/-

True copy P.A to Judge