Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court of India

Shive Kumar Tanti vs U.O.I. & Ors on 4 March, 2008

Bench: Tarun Chatterjee, Harjit Singh Bedi

           CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil)  1797 of 2008

PETITIONER:
SHIVE KUMAR TANTI

RESPONDENT:
U.O.I. & ORS.

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/03/2008

BENCH:
TARUN CHATTERJEE & HARJIT SINGH BEDI

JUDGMENT:

JUDGMENT O R D E R (Arising out of SLP(C)No.5518 of 2006) Leave granted.

This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dt.05.12.2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in C.W.J.C.No.7505 of 2004 by which the High Court has affirmed the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal by which the appellant's preference for the post of Train Clerk was not accepted. We have perused the impugned order. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that the High Court while dismissing the Writ Petition had not passed a speaking and reasoned order. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order and remit the case back to the High court for decision on merits and in accordance with law. We request the High Court to decide the matter preferably within three months from the date of communication of this order without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. The appeal is allowed to the extent indicated above. No order as to costs.

We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the matter and the same shall be decided by the High Court.