Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 117]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Mathew Varghese vs M. Amritha Kumar & Others on 3 November, 2014

Bench: Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, Abhay Manohar Sapre

  CONT. PETN. NO. 398-400 OF 2014


  ITEM NO.5                             COURT NO.7                SECTION XIA

                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                              CONTEMPT PETITION(C) No. 398-400/2014
                                                In
                                     C.A. No. 1927-1929/2014

  MATHEW VARGHESE                                                    Petitioner(s)

                                                VERSUS

  M. AMRITHA KUMAR & ORS.                                             Respondent(s)
  (With office report)
  WITH IA NOS. 14-16/2014 IN C.A. No. 1927-1929/2014
  [MATHEW VARGHESE V. M. AMRITHA KUMAR & ORS.]
  (For directions and Office Report)

  Date : 03/11/2014 These Matters were called on for hearing today.

  CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE


  For Petitioner(s)                 Mr. Abir Phukan, Adv.
                                    Mr. A. Raghunath, A.O.R.


  For Respondent(s)                 Mr. R. Basant, Sr. Adv.
  For RR 1                          Mr. Raghenth Basant, Adv.
                                    Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, A.O.R.

  For RR 8                          Mr. K. Vijayan, Adv.
                                    Mr. K. Rajeev, Adv.
                                    Ms. Meena C. R., A.O.R.

  For Indian Bank                   Mr. Himanshu Munshi, Adv.
                                    Mr. Durga Dutt, Adv.

                            UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
                                              O R D E R
Signature Not Verified Today the first respondent appeared before the Digitally signed by Kalyani Gupta Date: 2014.11.05 13:42:42 IST

Reason: Court and he is also represented by counsel Mr. PAGE NO. 1 OF 2 CONT. PETN. NO. 398-400 OF 2014 Senthil Jagadeesan, who is represented by Mr. R. Basant, learned senior counsel. The Bank is represented by Mr. Himanshu Munshi.

Mr. Basant, learned senior counsel submitted that the second respondent is the wife of the first respondent who is away from India and that she will file an affidavit of undertaking to appear before the Court as and when required. The appearance of first respondent is also dispensed with, with the direction to file a similar undertaking to appear in this Court as and when required. The respondent Nos. 1-6 are granted six weeks' time to file their replies.

Counsel for the non-applicants are also at liberty to file their replies to the I.A. Nos. 14-16.

List these contempt petitions along with the applications after six weeks.





                   [KALYANI GUPTA]                                     [SHARDA KAPOOR]
                     COURT MASTER                                        COURT MASTER




PAGE NO. 2 OF 2