Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Ms Chanchala Kumari vs Union Of India on 21 September, 2017

Bench: Chief Justice, Amitava Roy, A.M. Khanwilkar

                                                                                                       1

                                               IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                                CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

                                        WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.871 OF 2017



                         MS. CHANCHALA KUMARI                                      PETITIONER(S)

                                                               VERSUS

                         UNION OF INDIA & ANR.                                     RESPONDENT(S)




                                                          O R D E R

Espousing the cause of the daughter, a minor girl, aged about 13 years, a victim of rape, the mother has preferred this writ petition seeking medical termination of her pregnancy. When the matter was listed before this Court on 15th September, 2017, the Medical Board was directed to be constituted at AIIMS, New Delhi comprising of certain doctors as per the names suggested by Mr.Ranjit Kumar, learned Solicitor General after obtaining instructions. The initial report was not specific and thereafter this Court on 18th September, 2017 passed the following order:-

“Let the matter be listed on Thursday, 21st Signature Not Verified September, 2017 on which day the Medical Board, Digitally signed by ASHOK RAJ SINGH Date: 2017.09.21 19:21:30 IST consisting of Head of Departments, Obstetric Reason: and Gynecology, Paediatrics, Psychiatry, Radiology and Neurology from All India 2 Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi shall give its opinion with regard to medical termination of pregnancy. When we say medical termination of pregnancy we mean to convey all the factors including the factor of life of the fetus.” The competent authority of AIIMS, New Delhi, regard being had to the fact situation has constituted the Medical Board of 11 doctors. The report submitted by the Medical Board today reads as follows:-
“The case of Ms. 'X' was re-examined by the board members after which the board opines as follows:
Ms. 'X' is 24 weeks pregnant and termination of pregnancy is feasible. However, the ultrasound report shows 'low lying placenta', attempt to terminate pregnancy carries the risk of severe bleeding in which case a caesarian section will be required.” On a perusal of the report, we find that the termination of pregnancy is feasible. In view of the aforesaid, the termination of pregnancy is hereby allowed.
The victim being accompanied by her mother shall report at AIIMS, New Delhi on Friday, 22nd September, 2017 at 9.00 a.m. and thereafter the competent authority of AIIMS shall do the needful in the matter ensuring that all safety 3 measures are taken. The Institute shall preserve the terminus fetus. Needless to say all expenses shall be borne by the AIIMS, New Delhi.
The writ petition is allowed accordingly.
....................CJI.
(DIPAK MISRA) ......................J. (AMITAVA ROY) ......................J. (A.M.KHANWILKAR) NEW DELHI, SEPTEMBER 21, 2017.
                                                                       4



ITEM NO.12                 COURT NO.1                 SECTION X

               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F        I N D I A
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

              Writ Petition(s)(Civil)      No(s). 871/2017

MS CHANCHALA KUMARI                                    Petitioner(s)

                                  VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.                                  Respondent(s)

(FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.    ON IA 91463/2017)

Date : 21-09-2017 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR For Petitioner(s) Mr.Kunwar Aditya Singh, Adv. Mr.Anand K., Adv.
Ms.Ankita Upreti, Adv.
Mr.Suraj Prakash Singh, Adv. Ms.Shivangi Singh, Adv.
Mr.Divyesh Pratap Singh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr.Ranjit Kumar, SG Ms.Sadhana Sandhu, Adv.
Mr.Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The writ petition is allowed in terms of the signed order.
(Ashok Raj Singh) (H.S.Parasher) Court Master Assistant Registrar (Signed Order is placed in the file)