Delhi High Court
Vivek Jain vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others on 17 September, 2014
WPCRL no. 247 of 2014 U.C. Dhyani, J.
Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the writ petitioner.
Mr. V.K. Gemini, Dy. Advocate General with Ms. Shiwali Joshi, Brief Holder for the respondent State.
Learned counsel for the State makes a statement that after completion of investigation, final report has been submitted, as no case is said to have been made out against the petitioner.
In view of above development, this writ petition has rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with the observation that the interim order dated 12.03.2014, passed by this Court, shall continue till the submission of final report before the court concerned and no further.
(U.C. Dhyani, J.) 17.09.2014 HN