Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 5]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Md. Shamim Khan vs The State Of Jharkhand on 16 December, 2021

Bench: Ajay Rastogi, Abhay S. Oka

                                                        1

     ITEM NO.3                                COURT NO.14                   SECTION II-A

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F       I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)                    No(s).     9449/2021

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-08-2021
     in ABA No. 4725/2021 passed by the High Court Of Jharkhand At
     Ranchi)

     MD. SHAMIM KHAN                                                         PETITIONER(S)

                                                       VERSUS

     THE STATE OF JHARKHAND                                                  RESPONDENT(S)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.159174/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
     C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.159172/2021-EXEMPTION FROM
     FILING O.T. )

     Date : 16-12-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA


     For Petitioner(s)                  Mr. Girish Bhardwaj, Adv.
                                        Mr. Anand Shankar Jha, AOR

     For Respondent(s)


                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                O R D E R

The first application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner was rejected by the High Court by an order dated 10.11.2020. There was no substantial change of circumstances placed on record while filing the second application seeking pre-arrest bail under Section 438 of the Code and that came to be rejected by Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Anita Malhotra Date: 2021.12.16 the High Court under the order impugned dated 02.08.2021. 16:34:06 IST Reason:

Even before us, the learned Counsel for the petitioner is unable to show any change of circumstances to invoke the 2 jurisdiction of filing second application under Section 438 of the Code before the High Court.
We deprecate such practice of filing second application under Section 438 of the Code after the first being rejected. We have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and find no reason to interfere in our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution.
The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
 (POOJA SHARMA)                                  (BEENA JOLLY)
COURT MASTER (SH)                               COURT MASTER (NSH)