Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Satnam Singh @ Raju vs The State Nct Of Delhi on 6 January, 2021

Author: Rajnish Bhatnagar

Bench: Rajnish Bhatnagar

                            $~6
                            *     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                            +     BAIL APPLN. 4237/2020

                                  SATNAM SINGH @ RAJU                                  ..... Petitioner
                                               Through:            Mr. Harsh Vardhan Sharma,
                                                                   Advocate.
                                                      versus

                                  THE STATE NCT OF DELHI                    ..... Respondent
                                                Through: Dr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State
                                                         with SI Pankaj Saroha, PS Paschim
                                                         Vihar, East.

                                  CORAM:
                                  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR

                                               ORDER

% 06.01.2021 Crl. M.A. No. 18147/2021 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. the application stands disposed of.

BAIL APPLN. 4237/2020

This is an application filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of interim bail. The petitioner has moved the present application primarily on the ground that he has two young daughters and he seeks 45 days interim bail to look for prospective bridegroom for his elder daughter.

Status report has been filed by the State in which it has only been confirmed that the applicant has two young daughters. No names any of the prospective bridegrooms have been mentioned in the application so that the State can verify about the genuinity of the averments of the petitioner.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KAMAL KANT MENDIRATTA Signing Date:07.01.2021 16:27

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that after short-listing some names of the prospective bridegrooms he will provide their names and addresses to the IO within four weeks. Let the needful be done and the names and addresses of the prospective bridegrooms be got verified by the State before the next date of hearing.

In the meanwhile, trial Court shall make endeavour to complete recording of complainant's evidence on the date fixed.

List on 1st March, 2021.

RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J JANUARY 6, 2021 AK Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KAMAL KANT MENDIRATTA Signing Date:07.01.2021 16:27