Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Sayed Mehefuj Alli vs Vrs on 26 February, 2021

Author: S. K. Panigrahi

Bench: S. K. Panigrahi

                   CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. K. PANIGRAHI
                                BLAPL No. 6894 of 2020
                    Sayed Mehefuj Alli                      ... Petitioner
                                              Vrs.
                    State of Odisha                         ... Opp. Party
03.   26.02.2021           Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner and
                     learned counsel for the State.
                           The petitioner is in custody in connection
                     with Sadar PS Case No.294 of 2020 corresponding
                     to GR Case No.1235 of 2020, pending in the court
                     of the learned JMFC (Rural), Cuttack registered for
                     the alleged commission of offence under Sections
                     341, 323, 307, 506/34 of the IPC, has filed this
                     application under Section 439 of CrPC for his
                     release on bail.
                           The brief fact of the case is that the informant
                     is the wife of the petitioner and she has been
                     residing separately since near about one year. It
                     was alleged in the FIR that on 03.06.2020 night,
                     the informant had been to the house of the
                     petitioner to have conjugal life as usual. On the
                     fateful   night,   the    petitioner   had   invited   the
                     informant to his house, where a consensual sexual
                     relationship was established between them. Then
                     the petitioner suggested for his second marriage
                     since the informant is not able to bear a child. On
                     such suggestion, informant protested and petitioner
                                        2
      tried to take away her life by drowning her in the
      nearby pond. Neighbours noticed this fact.
               Learned counsel for the petitioner submits
      that the case has been committed to the court of
      learned Sessions Judge, Cuttack in ST Case No. 12
      of 2021. He further submits that the petitioner is
      the husband of the informant. The informant had
      also earlier filed FIR against her husband. The
      petitioner has been in custody since 17.08.2020.
               Learned counsel for the State vehemently
      opposed the bail prayer of the petitioner.
               Considering the submissions made, facts and
      circumstances          of   the case,   it   is directed   that
      the   petitioner be         released    on   bail   with some
      stringent terms and conditions as deemed just and
      proper by the learned Sessions Judge, Cuttack in
      ST Case No.12 of 2021 with further conditions
      that:-
               i)      the petitioner shall appear before the
                       learned trial court on each date of
                       posting of the case;
               ii)     he shall not threaten or coerce the
                       informant in any manner and
               iii)    he shall not tamper the evidence of
                       the prosecution witnesses in any
                       manner.

                      Violation of any of the conditions shall
      entail cancellation of the bail.
               The BLAPL is accordingly disposed of.
            Issue certified copy of this order on proper
      application.
                                              .............................
                                              S. K. Panigrahi, J.

AKP