Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 12]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Vinay Purulekar vs Pramod Meshram on 8 May, 2015

Bench: Pinaki Chandra Ghose, Uday Umesh Lalit

  ITEM NO.118                              COURT NO.12                    SECTION IIA

                                S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                                Criminal Appeal   No(s).   504-505/2010

  VINAY PURULEKAR                                                     Appellant(s)

                                                  VERSUS

  PRAMOD MESHRAM                                                      Respondent(s)

  (With office report)

  Date: 08/05/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

  CORAM :
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

  For Appellant(s)
                                     Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv.
                                     Mrs. Amita Singh Kalkal, Adv.
                                     Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv.

  For Respondent(s)
                                     Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Adv.
                                     Mr. S.S. Jauhar, Adv.
                                     Mr. V. K. Monga,Adv.

                           UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                              O R D E R

The Criminal Appeals are dismissed in terms of the signed order.

(VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER (Signed Order is placed on the file) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Vishal Anand Date: 2015.05.12 10:43:36 EAST Reason: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No(s). 504-505/2010 VINAY PURULEKAR Appellant(s) VERSUS PRAMOD MESHRAM Respondent(s) O R D E R We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties at length today.

We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order dated 6-12-2007 so passed by the High Court of Bombay. In view of that, we find no merit in the appeals filed by the appellant - complainant. Accordingly, the Criminal Appeals are dismissed.

......................J (PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE) ......................J (UDAY UMESH LALIT) NEW DELHI;

8TH MAY, 2015.