Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 22]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Bhoj Raj Garg vs Goyal Education And Welfare Society on 18 November, 2022

Bench: K.M. Joseph, Hrishikesh Roy

                                                               1

     ITEM NO.20                                     COURT NO.4                      SECTION IV-B

                                      S U P R E M E C O U R T O F               I N D I A
                                              RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                             No(s).       19654/2022

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-07-2022
     in CR No. 1811/2022 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At
     Chandigarh)

     BHOJ RAJ GARG                                                                   Petitioner(s)

                                                              VERSUS

     GOYAL EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS.                                      Respondent(s)

     (IA No.165065/2022-EXEMPTION                            FROM   FILING   C/C     OF       THE    IMPUGNED
     JUDGMENT)

     Date : 18-11-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH
                               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY

     For Petitioner(s)                       Mr. Anish Gautam, Adv.
                                             Mr. Siddhant Sharma, AOR
                                             Mr. Arvind Aggarwal, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)

                               UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                   O R D E R

The complaint of the petitioner is that the Execution Court is not abiding by the directions issued by this Court in the decision in Rahul S. Shah Vs. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi & Ors., reported in (2021) 6 SCC 418. In the said decision, this Court held as follows:-

“42. All Courts dealing with suits and Signature Not Verified execution proceedings shall mandatorily follow Digitally signed by Jayant Kumar Arora Date: 2022.11.19 13:16:04 IST Reason: the below mentioned directions :-

2. The Executing Court must dispose of the 2 Execution Proceedings within six months from the date of filing, which may be extended only by recording reasons in writing for such delay.” This means that it becomes the duty of the Execution Court to dispose of the execution proceedings at the earliest and since this Court has directed that the Execution Court must dispose of the execution proceedings within six months from the date of filing, which can be extended only by recording reasons in writing for such delay, this direction is meant to be observed. This would mean that every effort should be made to dispose of the execution petition within the said time limit and the Execution Court should have reasons for not being able to dispose of the execution petition. The Execution Court is duty bound to record reasons in writing when it is unable to dispose of the matter.

We need only reiterate what this court has already ordered. Subject to these observations, the Special Leave Petition is disposed of.

Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, is/are disposed of.

(JAYANT KUMAR ARORA)                                         (RENU KAPOOR)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS                                      ASSISTANT REGISTRAR