Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Bablu Sarkar & Ors vs The Howrah Municipal Corporation & Ors on 11 December, 2017

Author: Shekhar B. Saraf

Bench: Shekhar B. Saraf

                                                    1


11.12.2017
    ss
                                            W.P. 7492(W) of 2015
             ,




                                           Bablu Sarkar & ors.
                                                  Vs.
                                  The Howrah Municipal Corporation & ors.
                 ,,




                                               Ms. Shaoni Dey
                                                     ... For the petitioners
                                               Ms. Rituparna Ghosh Dey
                                                     ... For the respondent no.6

Mr. N. C. Bihani Ms. Papiya Banerjee Bihani ... H. M. C. , Counsel for the writ petitioner appears and submits that the Advocate on record for the petitioner is unwell and is unable to attend Court. She further submits that affidavit-in- reply is not with her. She seeks extension of time to file affidavit-in-reply.

Such prayer is allowed. Time to file affidavit-in-reply is extended by one week from date.

Affidavit-in-opposition filed by the private respondent be kept on record.

Counsel on behalf of the Howrah Municipal Corporation submits that his affidavit-in-opposition is also not ready.

Time is also granted to Howrah Municipal Corporation to file affidavit-in-opposition by one week from date. Petitioner shall filed affidavit-in-reply to the same, if necessary, within a week thereafter.

2

Let the matter appear three weeks hence.

(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)