Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Pritam Ganjewar Infrastructure ... vs M/S. Cemcon Concrete India Priate ... on 10 August, 2022

Author: G.S. Kulkarni

Bench: G.S. Kulkarni

         Digitally
         signed by
VIDYA    VIDYA
         SURESH AMIN
SURESH   Date:
AMIN     2022.08.11
         11:25:31
         +0530




                                                                    1                       11. ARP120_2022.doc

                       Vidya Amin
                                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 120 OF 2022

                               Pritam Ganjewar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.                  .. Petitioner
                                            Vs.
                               M/s. Cemcon Concrete India Pvt. Ltd., through
                               its Director Mr. Sachin Shelar                            .. Respondent

                               Mr. Jagdish G. Aradwad (Reddy) for the petitioner.

                                                         CORAM :        G.S. KULKARNI, J.
                                                         DATE :         AUGUST 10, 2022.
                               P.C.:

1. It is informed by learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondent is served. An affidavit of service is placed on record. However, despite service, the respondent is not represented.

2. As a matter of last chance, to enable the respondent to appear in the present proceeding, issue notice to the respondent, returnable on 24 August, 2022. In addition to Court notice, learned advocate for the petitioner is permitted to serve the respondent by private notice by all permissible modes and place on record the affidavit of service before the returnable date.

3. If the respondent despite service is not represented on the adjourned date of hearing, the Court shall proceed to hear the petitioner and pass appropriate orders.

4. Let the copy of this order be also served along with the advocate's notice to be issued to the respondent.

[G.S. KULKARNI, J.]