Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Shamrao Mahadeo Shete vs The State Of Maharashtra on 26 April, 2019

Bench: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Indira Banerjee

                                                               1

     ITEM NO.35                                     COURT NO.14                       SECTION II-A

                                       S U P R E M E C O U R T O F             I N D I A
                                               RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).2333/2019

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26-02-2019
     in ABA No.277/2019 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At
     Bombay)

     SHAMRAO MAHADEO SHETE                                                            Petitioner(s)

                                                           VERSUS

     THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA                                                         Respondent(s)

     Date : 26-04-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
                             HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE

     For Petitioner(s)                       Mr.   Gaurav Agarwal,Adv.
                                             Mr.   Anand Landge,Adv.
                                             Mr.   Abhishek Avachat,Adv.
                                             for   Mr. Jay Kishor Singh,AOR

     For Respondent(s)                       Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,AOR

                                UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                   O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the parties. We are not inclined to entertain this special leave petition. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

We however, expect the investigation to be concluded on expeditious basis, preferably within a period of two months from today.

Needless to say that on the petitioner surrendering and subsequently applying for regular bail, the observations made in Signature Not Verified the impugned order would not come in the way of consideration of Digitally signed by SARITA PUROHIT such an application for regular bail. Date: 2019.05.01 14:02:04 IST Reason:

(Anita Rani Ahuja) (Sarita Purohit) Branch Officer AR-cum-PS