Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

Sathiyamma vs Gayathri on 15 July, 2013

Author: Antony Dominic

Bench: Antony Dominic

       

  

   

 
 
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                            PRESENT:

                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
                                                 &
                      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN

            TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAYOF JUNE 2015/26TH JYAISHTA, 1937

                    RP.No. 1046 of 2014 IN Mat.Appeal.571/2009
                     ------------------------------------------------------------
   AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN Mat.Appeal 571/2009 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 15.7.2013

REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT IN MAT APPEAL:

       SATHIYAMMA, AGED 48 YEARS,
       D/O. DAKSHYANI AMMA, MUKESH BHAVANANM
       MUTHUKULAM VADAKUM MURI, MUTHUKULAM VILLAGE, HARIPAD
       ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

       BY ADVS.SRI.M.V.THAMBAN
                SRI.R.REJI
                SMT.THARA THAMBAN
                SRI.B.BIPIN
                SRI.ARUN BOSE

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDEDNTS IN MAT APPEAL:

    1. GAYATHRI, AGED 42 YEARS
       W/O. RAJENDRAN, PUTHANPURAYIL, ERICKAVU MURI
       KUMARAPURAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-690 548.

    2. RENJITH,, AGED 11 YEARS
       S/O. REJENDRAN, REPRESENTED BY GAYATHRI(MOTHER)
       PUTHANPURAYIL, ERICKAVU MURI, KUMARUPUARAM
       ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. PIN-690 548.

    3. C.P.RAJENDRAN, , AGED 47 YEARS
       S/O. RAGHAVAN, KALLIKSSERIL HOUSE, VADAKKUM MURI
       MUTHUKULAM VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-690 506.

       R BY SRI. S.SANAL KUMAR

       THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-06-2015, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAYPASSED THE FOLLOWING:



                    ANTONY DOMINIC & P.D.RAJAN, JJ.
                 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                            C.M.Appln.3907 OF 2014 in
                                 R.P.No.1046 of 2014
                 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                     Dated this the 16th day of June, 2015

                                        ORDER

Antony Dominic, J. C.M.Appln.3907 OF 2014:

This is an application filed to condone the delay of 485 days in filing the review petition. The only reason stated in the affidavit is that despite the advice to file a review, "due to ill health and acute financial stringency I could not pool the requisite amount". There is absolutely nothing to substantiate these vague averments.
In such circumstances, we are unable to accept the above unsubstantiated averments and condone the long and inordinate delay. C.M.Application is rejected.
Review petition will also stand rejected.
Sd/-
ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE Sd/-
P.D.RAJAN JUDGE jes