Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Mahalakshmi Swayamsahayata Mahila ... vs State Of Maharashtra Food, Civil ... on 16 December, 2020

Author: Manish Pitale

Bench: Manish Pitale

                                                 1                               wp st 8035-2020.odt


                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

                           Writ Petition Stamp No. 8035 of 2020

   Mahalakshmi Swayamsahayta Mahila Bachat Gat Vs. State of Maharashtra,
     Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Department & Others

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,                               Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                               Mr. U.J. Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioner
                               Ms. M.A. Barabde, AGP for the respondents No.1 to 3.


                               CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J.

DATED : DECEMBER 16, 2020 When the Writ Petition is called out for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that now the Revision Petitions are being taken up for consideration by the respondent No.1.

2. In the present case also, the petitioner had filed the Revision Petition before the respondent No.1 to challenge the impugned judgment and order dated 28/04/2020, passed by the respondent No.2. But, due to pandemic situation and since neither the Revision Petition nor the stay application was being taken up for consideration by the respondent No.1, the petitioner was constrained to approach this Court by filing the present Writ Petition. The present Writ Petition was entertained, notices were issued and replies have been filed on record.

::: Uploaded on - 17/12/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 18/12/2020 05:02:14 :::

2 wp st 8035-2020.odt

3. Considering the fact that now the respondent No.1 - State is taking up the Revision Petitions for consideration and disposal, the present Writ Petition can be disposed of with appropriate directions to the respondent No.1.

4. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1 to take up the Revision Petition, filed by the petitioner for consideration and to dispose of the same expeditiously and preferably within 8 weeks from today.

5. This Court is expressing no opinion on the merits of the contentions of the rival parties.

JUDGE MP Deshpande ::: Uploaded on - 17/12/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 18/12/2020 05:02:14 :::