Karnataka High Court
Kulur Satishchandra Kamath vs K. Ramakrishna Kamath on 12 December, 2025
Author: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
Bench: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:53288
MFA No. 5969 of 2016
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5969 OF 2016 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
1. KULUR SATISHCHANDRA KAMATH
S/O LATE K.M. KARNATH
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
R/A NO.29/1, TEMPLE STREET,
MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE - 03
1(A). SMT. JYOTHI SATISH CHANDRAKAMATH
W/O LATE KULUR SATISHCHANDRA KAMATH
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS.
1(B). SI. KULUR SACHIN KAMATH
S/O KULUR SATISHCHANDRA KAMATH
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
Digitally
signed by BOTH R/AT 58, 8TH CROSS,
RAMYA D 4TH MAIN, MALLESHWARAM - 03.
Location: ...APPELLANTS
HIGH
COURT OF (BY SMT. VEENA J. KAMATH, ADVOCATE)
KARNATAKA
AND:
1. K. RAMAKRISHNA KAMATH
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
2. K. NARAYANA KAMATH
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:53288
MFA No. 5969 of 2016
HC-KAR
3. K. NARASIMHA KAMATH
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
ALL ARE CHILDREN OF LATE K. PURUSHAM KAMATH
AND ALL ARE R/AT NO.5-98/4, GSB COLONY
NEAR BHAJANA MANDIRA, KODIKAL
MANGALORE, D.K. DISTRICT - 575 002.
4. SMT. POORNIMA KAMATH
W/O LATE KAMALAKSHA BHANDARY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
SHEVAGOOR COMPOUND, CAR STREET
MANGALORE-1, D.K. DISTRICT - 575 001.
5. K. VENKATESH KAMATH
S/O LATE K. PURUSHOTHAM KAMATH
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
R/A LIG 569, 9TH CROSS
9TH BLOCK, VEOLOA NAGAR
SHIMOGA DISTRICT - 571 012.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. CHANDRANATH ARIGA, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2
AND R4;
R3 AND R5 - NOTICE SERVED)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.41 RULE 21 R/W SEC.151 OF
CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24.08.2016 PASSED ON RA
NO.96/2013 ION THE FILE OF THE 3RD ADDITIONAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE, MANGALORE, DISMISSING THE APPLICATION
FILED U/O.41 RULE 21 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC:53288
MFA No. 5969 of 2016
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo dated 09.12.2025 seeking permission to withdraw the appeal.
In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/-
(HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2