Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Chattisgarh High Court

Balak Ram Rathiya And Ors vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. 16 ... on 29 August, 2018

Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra

Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra

                                                                                    NAFR

                       HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                      WPC No. 43 of 2013

           1. Balak Ram Rathiya S/o Parwal Sai Aged About 60 Years, Caste Kanwar,
              Residence of Vill. Sakalo, PS Kapu, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, Dist. Raigarh
              Chhattisgarh

           2. Lal Bahadur Baburam S/o Jheetu Ram Aged About 40 Years,Caste Uraon,
              R/o Vill. Jantatikra (Sakalo), Police Station Kapu, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, Dist.
              Raigarh Chhattisgarh

           3. Ramdev Lakda S/o Ghur Sai Aged About 40 Years, Case Uraon, Residence
              of Vill. Jantatikra (Sakalo), PS Kapu, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, Dist. Raigarh
              Chhattisgarh

           4. Smt. Dhanmati Rathiya W/o Sadhram, Aged About 72 Years, Caste
              Kanwar, Residence of Vill. Indfalo (Alola) PS Kapu, Tah. Dharamjaigarh,
              Dist. Raigarh Chhattisgarh

                                                                           ---- Petitioner

                                             Versus

           1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary., Water Resources Deptt.,
              Mantrlaya, PS Rakhi, Tah. Aarang Naya Raipur District Raipur,
              Chhattisgarh

           2. Collector Raigarh C.G., District : Raigarh, PS Raigarh Chhattisgarh

           3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Dharamjaigarh, PS Dharamjaigarh, Dist.
              Raigarh Chhattisgarh

                                                                         ---- Respondent
        For Petitioners                      None
        For Respondent/State                 Mr. Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate


                                      Order On Board By

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra 29/8/2018

1. Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, even in two rounds, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution.

2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Sd/-

(Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge Shyna Shyna