Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, ... vs M/S Mirza Tanners Ltd. on 19 January, 2010

Bench: Rajes Kumar, Subhash Chandra Nigam

Court No. - 37

Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 76 of 2007

Petitioner :- The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Kanpur
Respondent :- M/S Mirza Tanners Ltd.
Petitioner Counsel :- R.K. Upadhyayay

Hon'ble Rajes Kumar,J.

Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Nigam,J.

Heard Sri R.K.Upadhyaya, learned Standing Counsel and Sri S.D.Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee.

At the instance of the Revenue, the following substantial question of law has been raised:

"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble I.T.A.T. was justified in allowing the assessee's claim of deduction u/s 80HHC of the Income tax Act, 1961 by placing reliance on the order of the Hon'ble HIgh Court in the case of Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd. Vs. C.I.T. (245ITR, 769), ignoring the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Chowringee Sales Bureau Vs. C.I.T. (87 ITR 542) wherein it has been held that the excise duty is to be included in the total turnover for the purpose of computation of deduction U/s 80HHC of the Income tax Act, 1961.?"

Sri R.K.Upadhyaya, learned Standing Counsel very fairly submitted that the issue involved is now concluded by the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Commissioner of Income tax Vs. Lakshmi Machine Works, reported in 290 ITR, 667 (SC), wherein it has been held by the Apex Court that the excise duty and sales tax are to be excluded from the total turnover while calculating the deduction under section 80HHC (3) of the Income tax Act and, therefore, the view of the Tribunal is in accordance to the decision of the Apex Court.

In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed.

Order Date :- 19.1.2010 R./