Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Sudershan And Others vs Divisional Commissioner on 22 June, 2016

Bench: Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Sandeep Sharma

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
                                      CWP No.2065 of 2010.
                                      Decided on: June 22, 2016.




                                                                .
    Sudershan and others                                     ...Petitioners.





                           VERSUS
    Divisional Commissioner, Shimla and others              ...Respondents.

    Coram





    The Hon'ble Mr.Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice.
    The Hon'ble Mr.Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
    Whether approved for reporting?
    For the petitioners:              Mr.Surinder Saklani, Advocate.




                                       of
    For the Respondents:              Mr.Shrawan    Dogra,    Advocate
                                      General, with Mr.Romesh Verma
                                      and Mr.Anup Rattan, Addl.A.Gs.
                 rt                   and Mr.J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G., for
                                      respondents No.1 and 2.
                                      Mr.Neeraj Gupta, Advocate for
                                      respondent No.3.

    Mansoor Ahmad Mir, C.J. (Oral)

By the medium of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought quashment of orders, dated 6th April, 2010 and 20th September, 2007, passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Shimla and the Sub Divisional Collector, Solan, respondents No.1 and 2, respectively, on the grounds taken in the memo of writ petition.

2. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 stated that the Divisional Commissioner, Shimla has passed the order, dated 6th April, 2010 legally. However, it has been stated that since the delay had already been condoned, the Divisional Commissioner was required to hear the appeal on merits and pass the order accordingly. His statement is taken on record.

::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 20:38:06 :::HCHP

...2...

3. In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed, the impugned order, dated 6th April, 2010, passed by the Divisional .

Commissioner, Shimla is quashed and set aside and the parties are relegated to the Divisional Commissioner, Shimla, who shall pass the order afresh after hearing the parties. Parties, through their counsel, are directed to appear before the Divisional Commissioner on 11th of July, 2016. The respondents are at liberty to raise all legal objections available to them before the Divisional Commissioner.

4. rt The writ petition is disposed of accordingly, so also the pending CMPs, if any.

(Mansoor Ahmad Mir) Chief Justice.




    22nd June, 2016.                                   (Sandeep Sharma)
         (Tilak)                                           Judge







                                            ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 20:38:06 :::HCHP