Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Archit International vs Cc (Preventive), Amritsar on 23 May, 2014

        

 


CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 

WEST BLOCK NO.II, R.K. PURAM, NEW DELHI-110066.

DIVISION BENCH

Court No.2 

Appeal No.C/31/2010



 (Arising out of OIA No.112/Cus/Ldh/09 dt.20.10.2009 passed by CC & CE (Appeals), Chandigarh-I)

                              

Archit International						Appellant                                                 

      Vs.	                                                                                 

CC (Preventive), Amritsar					Respondent

And Appeal No.C/32/2010 (Arising out of OIA No.110-111/Cus/Ldh/09 dt.20.10.2009 passed by CC & CE (Appeals), Chandigarh-I) Om International Appellant Vs. CC (Preventive), Amritsar Respondent Present for the Appellant: None Present for the Respondent: Shri Sanjay Jain, DR Date of hearing/Decision: 23.05.2014 Coram: Honble Mr.D.N.Panda, Judicial Member Honble Mr.Manmohan Singh, Technical Member FINAL ORDER NO.52336-52337/2014 PER: D.N.PANDA We do not find it is a productive exercise to keep appeals pending in the Tribunal when there is small amount of refund claim of Rs.50,623/- in Appeal No.C/31/2010 and refund claim Rs.1,05,096/- in Appeal No.C/32/2010 are invovled. Ld.Commissioner (Appeals) brought out that there was failure to fulfil the condition of Notification No.102/07-Cus dated 14.09.2007 for which refund was not admissible to the a appellant. There is no good ground available in the memo of appeal to contradict the findings of ld.Commissioner (Appeals). Accordingly both appeals are dismissed.


   (Dictated & pronounced in the open court)



	

(MANMOHAN SINGH)                       (D.N.PANDA)

TECHNICAL MEMEBR                      JUDICIAL MEMBER

      

                                                 

mk















































































      

      

      

      

      

      

      









































































































































































































































5





5

Appeal No.C/31-32/10