Gujarat High Court
Daxa Ben W/O Riteshbhai Thakkar vs State Of Gujarat on 6 April, 2023
Author: Nirzar S. Desai
Bench: Nirzar S. Desai
R/CR.MA/9751/2022 ORDER DATED: 06/04/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 9751 of 2022
==========================================================
DAXA BEN W/O RITESHBHAI THAKKAR
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
JUCKY LUCKY CHAN(8033) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR DHAWAN JAISWAL APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI
Date : 06/04/2023
ORAL ORDER
1. Rule. Learned APP, Mr.Dhawan Jaiswal waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.
2. By way of the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant - accused has prayed for anticipatory bail in connection with I-C.R.No. 01 of 2022 registered with Botad ACB Police Station, Dist.Botad for the offences punishable under Sections 186, 323, 332, 506(1) and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 72 of Information Technology Act.
3. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the nature of allegations are such for which custodial Page 1 of 7 Downloaded on : Thu Apr 06 20:46:09 IST 2023 R/CR.MA/9751/2022 ORDER DATED: 06/04/2023 interrogation at this stage is not necessary. He further submits that the applicant will keep himself available during the course of investigation, trial also and will not flee from justice.
4. Learned advocate for the applicant on instructions states that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions including imposition of conditions with regard to powers of Investigating Agency to file an application before the competent Court for his remand. He further submit that upon filing of such application by the Investigating Agency, the right of applicant accused to oppose such application on merits may be kept open. Learned advocate, therefore, submitted that considering the above facts, the applicant may be granted anticipatory bail.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent - State has opposed grant of anticipatory bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.
6. Having heard the learned advocates for the parties Page 2 of 7 Downloaded on : Thu Apr 06 20:46:09 IST 2023 R/CR.MA/9751/2022 ORDER DATED: 06/04/2023 and perusing the material placed on record and taking into consideration the facts of the case, nature of allegations, gravity of offences, role attributed to the accused, without discussing the evidence in detail, at this stage, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant.
7. This Court has considered following aspects,
(i) the FIR being delayed by approximately 1 year and 4 months from the date of the alleged offence;
(ii) it appears that the case against the present applicant was of seeking illegal gratification and whereas the Trap Laying Officer, was not successful in the trap in question;
(iii) it also appears that the FIR relies upon certain conversation between the present applicant and the first informant and whereas except for such material, there is nothing against the present applicant;
Page 3 of 7 Downloaded on : Thu Apr 06 20:46:09 IST 2023R/CR.MA/9751/2022 ORDER DATED: 06/04/2023
(iv) this Court has also considered the aspect of the applicant having co-operated with the investigation and accepted to undergo Voice Spectrography Test; and
(v) also considering the fact that co-accused having played identical role has already been enlarged on bail by coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 30.09.2022 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.10962 of 2022.
8. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, since the custodial interrogation of the applicant is not required, I am inclined to consider the case of the applicants.
9. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors., reported at [2011] 1 SCC 694, wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court reiterated the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in the case of Shri Gurubaksh Singh Sibbia & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab, reported at (1980) 2 SCC 565.
Page 4 of 7 Downloaded on : Thu Apr 06 20:46:09 IST 2023R/CR.MA/9751/2022 ORDER DATED: 06/04/2023
10. In the result, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest in connection with I-C.R.No. 01 of 2022 registered with Botad ACB Police Station, Dist.Botad on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with one surety of like amount on the following conditions that the applicant:
(a) shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available for interrogation whenever required;
(b) shall remain present at concerned Police Station on 18.04.2023 between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;
(c) shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer;
(d) shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and not to play mischief with the Page 5 of 7 Downloaded on : Thu Apr 06 20:46:09 IST 2023 R/CR.MA/9751/2022 ORDER DATED: 06/04/2023 evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;
(e) shall at the time of execution of bond, furnish the address to the investigating officer and the court concerned and shall not change residence till the final disposal of the case till further orders;
(f) shall not leave India without the permission of the concerned trial court and if having passport shall deposit the same before the concerned trial court within a week; and
(g) it would be open to the Investigating Officer to file an application for remand if he considers it proper and just and the learned Magistrate would decide it on merits;
11. Despite this order, it would be open for the Investigating Agency to apply to the competent Magistrate, for police remand of the applicant. The applicants shall remain present before the learned Page 6 of 7 Downloaded on : Thu Apr 06 20:46:09 IST 2023 R/CR.MA/9751/2022 ORDER DATED: 06/04/2023 Magistrate on the first date of hearing of such application and on all subsequent occasions, as may be directed by the learned Magistrate. This would be sufficient to treat the accused in the judicial custody for the purpose of entertaining application of the prosecution for police remand. This is, however, without prejudice to the right of the accused to seek stay against an order of remand, if, ultimately, granted, and the power of the learned Magistrate to consider such a request in accordance with law. It is clarified that the applicant, even if, remanded to the police custody, upon completion of such period of police remand, shall be set free immediately, subject to other conditions of this anticipatory bail order.
12. At the trial, the concerned trial court shall not be influenced by the prima facie observations made by this Court in the present order.
13. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.
(NIRZAR S. DESAI,J) MISHRA AMIT V. Page 7 of 7 Downloaded on : Thu Apr 06 20:46:09 IST 2023