Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Sayed Anisur Rahaman vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 25 September, 2025
25.09.2025
SL No. 16
Court No. 550
sk
WPA 23074 of 2025
Sayed Anisur Rahaman
Vs
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Apalak Basu
...for the petitioner
Mr. Amitabrata Roy, G.P.
Ms. Jyotsna Roy Mukherjee
...for the State
The State Legal Services Authority, West Bengal
has filed the present writ petition on behalf of the life
convict namely Sayed Anisur Rahaman (have undergone
for more than 14 years 11 months and 2 days), who has
been convicted by the learned Additional District &
Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Birbhum, Session Case No.
70/02 arising out of Nanoor Police Station Case No.
68/2000 dated 27.7.2000 under Sections
147/148/149/326/307/302/120B of the Indian Penal
Code read with Section 25/27 Arms Act and 9B(2) of the
Indian Explosive Act.
The petitioner has prayed for pre-mature release of
the life convict since the guidelines prescribed by the
National Legal Services Authority as well as Hon'ble apex
Court are not being followed by the respondent
authorities.
I have gone through the National Legal Services Authority's Standard Operating Procedures on the Process of Premature Release, Parole Furlough of Prisoners, 2022 and also Section 61(2) of the West Bengal Correctional Services Act, 1992.
It is trite to say that National Legal Services Authority has issued Standard Operating Procedure for premature release of the life convicts and the Hon'ble 2 Supreme Court has also directed all the States of India to formulate the policy for premature release, remission of sentences in respect of the life convicts, and the same has been reported in 2025 SCC Online SC 349, In Re:
Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail.
In view of the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the State should not wait for convict's application for pre-mature release and should take appropriate steps periodically.
It prima facie appears that it is not followed in this matter.
Accordingly, the respondent authorities are directed to consider the prayer of the convict/ petitioner, Sayed Anisur Rahaman in accordance with the relevant guidelines and laws as mentioned above and to pass appropriate order in connection with his prayer of the convict Sayed Anisur Rahaman with the relevant guidelines of NALSA and also in accordance with Section 61(2) of West Bengal Correctional Services Act, 1992 within two months from date and to inform the said decision to the life convict immediately thereupon. This writ petition be treated as prayer for premature release on behalf of the life convict.
With this direction, the instant writ petition is disposed of.
The life convict be informed of this order through the State Legal Services Authority, West Bengal accordingly.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all formalities.
All parties are directed to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of the Calcutta High Court.
(Apurba Sinha Ray J.)