Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mrharsh Raturi vs Ministry Of Human Resource Development on 2 December, 2015

                CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                   (Room No.315, B­Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066)



                   Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar)

                                          Information Commissioner


                                       CIC/RM/A/2014/001441­SA

       Harsh Raturi v. PIO, Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University

                                          Important Dates and time taken:




     RTI: 30.07.2013                    Reply: 19.09.2013                         Time: 51 days

     FAA: 06.09.2013                    FAO: 17.09.2013                           Time: 11 days

     SA: 26.03.2014                     Hearing: 04.11.2015                       Decision: 02­12­2015  

     Result: Disposed of with direction.




Parties Present:


1.      Appellant is not present. Dr. Y. S. Farwsan, Associate Prof., CPIO represents Public 

authority.


FACTS:

2. Appellant by his RTI application sought to know whether Ramesh Chandra ever been a  regular or private student of any Post Graduate Course/degree of the University, if yes, his  enrolment number etc. Having received no reply, appellant filed first appeal. First appellate  authority directed to provide information within a week. In compliance of FAA order, CPIO  replied on 19.9.2013. Being unsatisfied, appellant approached the Commission.  Proceedings Before the Commission:

3. Mr. Y. S. Farswan, CPIO represented that it is not possible to trace out the details of a  person who passed out prior to 2001 without giving specific details, as they have more than  180 affiliated colleges and every year around 1.5 lakh students are passing out. He stated that  District   Election  Officer   also  received  such  complaint   and  they   have  sought   details   of   Mr.  Ramesh Chand Pokhryal, now MP from Haridwar.

4. The Commission directs the respondent authority to send a notice to the address of the  elected   representative   from   Haridwar   constituency   in   Lok   Sabha   seat,   to   furnish   specific  details of information, such as, when he had passed out MA from HNBG University, along with  self   attested   copy   of   MA   mark­sheet   etc.   The   Commission   also   directs   the   respondent  authority to send this notice to the Haridwar address of the MP and Lok Sabha Secretary, to  hand   over   this   letter   to   the   MP   Mr.   Ramesh   Chand   Pokhryal   to   provide   necessary  specifications to the university, and the appellant so that University can verify the academic  record  of   the   MP.     The   Commission  also  directs   the  Secretary,   Lok   Sabha  to  collect   the  specific information from its records and send the same to the University for making necessary  verification and giving reply to the appellant.

5. The Commission orders accordingly.

(M. Sridhar Acharyulu) Information Commissioner  Authenticated true copy (U. C. Joshi) Deputy Secretary Addresses of the parties:

1. The CPIO under RTI, Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, Dist, Pauri Garhwal, Srinagar, Uttrakhand­246174.
2. The Secretary, Lok Sabha, Central Secretariat, New Delhi,  Delhi ­ 110001.
2. Shri Harsh Raturi, 130/77 Kalidas Marg, Dehradun­248001.