Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Rajkumar Bapurao Shinde vs The State Of Maharashtra on 31 January, 2020

Author: Prakash D. Naik

Bench: Prakash D. Naik

                                      1 of 3                       915.ABA.2130.2019.doc




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

      CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2130 OF 2019

 Rajkumar Bapurao Shinde                                              Applicant
       versus
 The State of Maharashtra                                             Respondent

 Mr.Ujwal R. Agandsurve for applicant.
 Smt.A.A.Takalkar, APP, for State.

                               CORAM :         PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

                               DATE     :      31st January 2020
 PC :


 1.       The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with
 CR No.564 of 2019 registered with Vijapur Naka Police Station,
 Solapur under Sections 103, 104 and 105 of Trademarks Act, 1999.
 The FIR is lodged on 22nd August 2019.


 2.       The FIR is lodged by complainant Smt.Mamta Pawan Khatri.
 According to her, she is producing food item "Kurkure" in the name
 of Tirupati Food Products. She has a shop license for the same and
 that her trademark is named as "Jimboy" and trademark logo is
 picture of one cartoon. The logo and name are registered under the
 Trademarks Act, 1999 on 17th February 2014. The allegations in the
 FIR against the applicant-accused are that the applicant is also
 producing Kurkure in the name of Samarth Food Product and using
 the name "Jaadu" instead of "Jimboy" on his cartoon, thereby using
 the same Trademark of the complainant and as such has infringed
 the right of the complainant to exclusively use that trademark.
 According to the respondent, therefore, the offences are committed




::: Uploaded on - 03/02/2020                        ::: Downloaded on - 12/06/2020 14:24:29 :::
                                     2 of 3                    915.ABA.2130.2019.doc


 by the applicant-accused punishable under Sections 103, 104 and
 105 of Trademarks Act, 1999.


 3.       Learned counsel for applicant submitted that the cartoon with
 which the complainant claims to be her logo cannot be her exclusive
 trademark because it is a commonly available art work.                         He
 submitted that there was correspondence between the parties and it
 essentially indicates a civil dispute. No offence is committed by the
 applicant. Learned counsel, on instructions, submitted that the
 applicant has stopped using the cartoon and logo "Jimboy".


 4.       The applicant was granted interim protection vide order dated
 1st     October      2019.    Considering   the   controversy,        custodial
 interrogation of the applicant is not necessary. The applicant can be
 directed to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, I pass following
 order :


                                   ORDER

(i) Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application No.2130 of 2019 is allowed and disposed of;

(ii) Interim order dated 1st October 2019 is confirmed;

(iii) In the event of arrest of applicant in connection with "CR No.564 of 2019 registered with Vijapur Naka Police Station, Solapur, the applicant is directed to be released on bail on executing PR bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount;

(iv) The applicant shall attend Vijapur Naka Police Station, Solapur on 10th, 11th and 12th February 2020 between 11 am and 1 pm, and thereafter as and when called till filing of charge sheet;

::: Uploaded on - 03/02/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 12/06/2020 14:24:29 :::

3 of 3 915.ABA.2130.2019.doc

(v) The applicant shall not use the cartoon and logo "Jimboy in future.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) MST ::: Uploaded on - 03/02/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 12/06/2020 14:24:29 :::