Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Pinak Bharat And Co. And Bina V. Advani vs Anil Ramrao Naik (Res) And Vinayak ... on 17 June, 2019

Author: R.I. Chagla

Bench: R.I. Chagla

                                               3,52.CHSCDL.1388.18.in COMEX.22.16.doc



             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
              ORDINARY ORIGINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

               CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 1388 OF 2018
                                IN
           COMMERCIAL EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2016


Pinak Bharat & Co. & Bina V. Advani             ...      Claimants
      Versus
Anil Ramrao Naik                                ...      Respondent
      And
Shripad Vaman Rajadhyax & Ors.                  ...      Applicants

                               WITH
                CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 43 OF 2016
                                IN
           COMMERCIAL EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2016

                               WITH
               CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 664 OF 2018
                                IN
           COMMERCIAL EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2016

                               WITH
               CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 665 OF 2018
                                IN
           COMMERCIAL EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2016

                               WITH
           COMMERCIAL EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2016

                               WITH
               CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 561 OF 2019
                                IN
           COMMERCIAL EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2016



Mr. Prerak Sharma i/b Mr. R.H. Pathak - Decree Holder.
Mr. V.S. Kapse for Judgment Debtor.
Mr. S.D. Chitgopikar, Deputy Sheriff, present.

Waghmare                                                                          1/3



  ::: Uploaded on - 19/06/2019              ::: Downloaded on - 19/06/2019 22:54:47 :::
                                                         3,52.CHSCDL.1388.18.in COMEX.22.16.doc



Mrs. Jyoti Chavan for the Applicant in CHSCDL/1388/2018.
Mr. Clive D'Souza for Applicant in CHSCD/561/2019.
Mr. Arsh Mishra i/b M.V. Kini & Co. for BEST.
Mr. Chirag Mody a/w Ms. Kavisha Shah and Ms. Minal Pawar i/b Ajinkya
Jaibhave for the Applicants in CHSCDL/664/2018 and CHSCDL/665/2018.


                                       CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA, J.

DATED : 17th JUNE, 2019.

P.C. :

1 The Sheriff's report is taken up for consideration. It is pointed out that the subject property has been sold and as per order dated 03.04.2019, out of the sale proceeds the payments towards the dues of the MCGM as unpaid property tax; BEST dues and dues of the Collector and District Magistrate as set out in Annexure-3 of the statement of Sheriff's Poundage Calculation would necessary have to be made and appropriate directions have been sought from this Court for making these payments in prayer clauses (i) and (ii) of the Sheriff's report. It is further prayed for in the Sheriff's report that after making payment of outstanding amounts in respect of the subject property to the said Authorities, the Sheriff of Mumbai may be directed to encash the remaining fixed deposits of the sale proceeds and transfer the net amount of sale proceeds after deducting Sheriff's poundage of Rs.5,38,532/- i.e. 1% on surplus funds to the office of the Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court, Bombay. Waghmare 2/3 ::: Uploaded on - 19/06/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 19/06/2019 22:54:47 :::

3,52.CHSCDL.1388.18.in COMEX.22.16.doc 2 Considering the directions issued in order dated 03.04.2019 for payment out of the sale proceeds to the MCGM, BEST and Collector, Mumbai, the sheriff's report is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (i) and (ii) and the Sheriff is directed to make payments to these authorities and to encash the remaining fixed deposits of sale proceeds and transfer the net amount of sale proceeds after deducting the sheriff's poundage of the said sum of Rs.5,38,532/- i.e. 1% on surplus funds to the office of Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court, Bombay, within a period of two weeks from today.

3 Sheriff's report is accordingly disposed of in the above terms. 4 The learned Counsel for the Judgment Debtor applies for time to file reply to the Sheriff's report. Application is rejected as the Sheriff's report has been disposed of.

5 List the Chamber Summonses which are pending in Commercial Execution Application No.22 of 2016 on 01.07.2019 at 3.00 p.m. for hearing.

(R.I. CHAGLA, J.) Waghmare 3/3 ::: Uploaded on - 19/06/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 19/06/2019 22:54:47 :::