Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Bipra Ustaba Shethy Father Of Lt. ... vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 1 October, 2015

Author: J.B.Pardiwala

Bench: J.B.Pardiwala

                     R/SCR.A/940/2008                                                   ORDER




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                      SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 940 of 2008
         ==========================================================
                  BIPRA USTABA SHETHY FATHER OF LT. REBINDRA
                              SHETHY....Applicant(s)
                                     Versus
                      STATE OF GUJARAT & 2....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR PK SHUKLA, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
         NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2 - 3
         PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA

                                             Date : 01/10/2015


                                               ORAL ORDER

By this writ­application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the  petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:­ (A) To admit and allow this petition;

(B) To order appropriate inquiry/investigation in the custodial death of  petitioner's   son   Ravindra   by   C.B.I   or   any   other   independent  authority or agency in the facts and circumstances of the case;

(C) To direct the State Government to pay compensation of Rs. 10 lac to  the   petitioner   for   custodial   death   of   his   son   Ravindra   in   the  Pandesara Police Station on 16.4.2007;

(D) To call for the papers in respect of inquiry/investigation;

(H) To quash and set aside the inquiry report dated 11.4.2008;

(I) To  give   direction  to   hand  over   the   inquiry  to   some  independent  State   authority   who   can   investigate   the   matter   without   being  influenced by anyone;



                                                   Page 1 of 5

HC-NIC                                          Page 1 of 5      Created On Sun Oct 04 02:07:01 IST 2015
                      R/SCR.A/940/2008                                                   ORDER




It appears from the materials on record that the son of the petitioner was  arrested by the Police in connection with an offence punishable under Section  379 of the IPC.  While he was in judicial custody, his body was found hanging  from the grill of the door of the lockup.  It appears that the son of the petitioner  committed   suicide   while   he   was   in   the   lockup.     The   body   was   sent   for  postmortem examination.   The postmortem examination revealed the cause of  death to  be asphyxia on account of the pressure over  neck by ligature.   An  inquiry   under   Section   174   of   the   Code   of   Criminal   Procedure   was   also  undertaken by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Choryasi.  

It is the case of the petitioner, being the father of the deceased, that his  son   had   not   committed   suicide   while   he   was   in   the   lockup,   but   he   was  murdered.  

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, "F" Division, Surat City has filed a  detailed affidavit, inter­alia stating as under:­ "6.   It   is   further   most   respectfully   submitted   that   on 16.04.2007 at about 4:00 o' clock one complainant   Pramodkumar   Ramsuresh   Pande   residing   at   Visatnagar   Plot   No.59   Pandasara   Surat   came   to   the   Pandasara   Police   Station   along   with   the   Accused   person   and   contacted   the   head   constable   Darasing   Babubhai   for   the   purpose   of   lodging   the   complaint   of   the   cycle   theft   hence   Head   Constable   Darasing   directed   the   complainant  to  approached  the  PSO  of  the  Pandasara   Police   Station.   Accordingly   complaint   came   to   be   registered   against   the   accused   person   namely   Kunna@Ravi.   Investigating   Officer   (IO)   Arvindbhai   prepared written report and came to be submitted to   the   police   station   officer   along   with   the   accused   person Kunna @ Ravi and hence the FIR bearing a No.   66 of 2007 for the offences punishable under Section   379 came to be registered and accordingly the report   under section 157 came to be declared. 

7.   It   is   further   most   respectfully   submitted   that   the   after   interrogating   the   complainant   and   the   witness   Narendrasinh   Pande   residing   at   block   no.59   Page 2 of 5 HC-NIC Page 2 of 5 Created On Sun Oct 04 02:07:01 IST 2015 R/SCR.A/940/2008 ORDER Visatnagar Pandasara Surat, the accused person Kunna  @ Ravi son of Dukhishayam Ravi aged about 20 years   Pandasara Gujarat Housing Board Police Colony, Surat   came to be arrested at about 5:00 o'clock and since   hame   of   the   relatives   of   the   accused   could   not   be   disclosed by the accused person the intimation about  his arrest came to be given to by surendrasinh Raut   who   is   the   social   leader   of   the   residents   of   the   Orrisa   Samaj   and   thereafter   making   entry   in   the   lockup   register   about   7:10   the   accused   person   was   lodged in the lockup at the Pandasara Police Station   and   investigating   Officer   Head   Constable   Darasing   along with the complaint visited offence place, and   carried out offence place panchnama in the presence   of   the   panch   witness   and   there   after   recorded   the   statements of the witness. The Investigating Officer   (IO)   returned   at   the   police   station   at   about   7:15   and   with   a   view   to   interrogate   the   accused   person   police constable Tulsibhai Saradhya was sent to take  out accused person Kunna @ Ravi from the lock up but   when the police constable reached at the lock up he   spotted   the   accused   person   in   the   position   of   hanging himself with the his own shirt tied with the   grill/irons of the door of the lockup. 

No sooner the picket police Constable intimated   this   fact   to   the   Investigating   Officer   (IO)   Head   Constable   Darasingh   the   Police   Inspector   of   Pandasara   Police   Station   was   forthwith   intimated   about the same and accordingly the Police Inspector   instructed the PSO to lodge complaint No.13 of 2007.   And hence Accused no came to be registered at about   19:45   and   the   inquiry   was   initiated   by   police   Inspector   himself.   During   the   course   of   inquiry   under Section 174 the FSL officer was called upon at   about   19:50.   The   photography   and   video­graphy   was   also conducted as well as the SDM Chaurayasi Prant   was intimated to draw the inquest panchnama. 

8. The Police Inspector intimated the higher officer   forthwith   about   this   unfortunate   event   and   simultaneously   the   relatives   of   the   deceased   Maternal   Uncle   Ravi   Bathram   Shetty   and   his   cousin   brother   Purnachandra   Jalandhar   Shetty   and   Naranay   Gandhrva Shetty were also informed about the same. 

It is further most respectfully submitted that   these   relatives   disclosed   the   real   name   of   the   accused  as  Kunna@Ravi  son  of  Vipra  Shetty   residing   at Nunizola Post­Bargam Tal: Bhanjnagar. 



                                    Page 3 of 5

HC-NIC                           Page 3 of 5      Created On Sun Oct 04 02:07:01 IST 2015
             R/SCR.A/940/2008                                            ORDER




After completing the proceedings by the S.D.M.,   photography and videography, FSL inspected the place   of the offence place and thereafter the dead body of   the deceased was sent to New Civil Hospital for the   purpose of conducting the postmortem. The penal of 5  doctors performed Postmortem with vedeography. 

9.   It   is   further   most   respectfully   submitted   that   intimation in this regard was sent through telephone   to   the   parents   of   the   deceased.   But   since   the   economic   condition   of   the   parents   of   the   deceased   was not good hence the dead body was handed over to   the   distant   relatives   for   the   last   rites   of   the   deceased on 17.04.2007.

10.  It  is  further  most  respectfully  submitted  that   the   video   and   C.D.   Of   Postmortem   along   with   the   report  of  the  penal  of  the  5  doctors   were  sent  in   the seal cover to the Hon'ble National Human Right   Commission New Delhi. The cause of death as per the   report of the doctor was as Asphyxia due to pressure   over neck by ligature. The shirt is also sent to the   FSL Surat for the purpose of tensile test and after   completing   the   aforesaid   inquiry   under   section   174   the report dated 22.10.2007 came to be sent to the   sub   Divisional   Magistrate   Choryashi   (SDM)   for   the   purposed   of   approval   of   A.   D   Summary.   The   said   report of pending before the SDM for final approval.  

11. It is further most respectfully submitted that   it is not correct that the signature of the cousin   brother   were   taken   on   the   blank   papers.   It   is   pertinent   to   note   over   here   that   by   virtue   of   section   174   of   Criminal   Procedure   Code,   signed   statements   of   all   the   concerned   were   recorded   including   the   statements   of   Maternal   Uncle   Ravi   Bathram   Shetty   and   his   cousin   brother   Purnachandra   Jalandhar Shetty and Naranay Gandhrva Shetty as well  as   the   Surendransinh   Rahout   and   the   dead   body   was   handed over to this afore stated persons and hence   it   is   not   correct   to   say   that   the   signature   were   obtained on the blank paper. So far as the documents   and  original   papers  with   regard  to  custodial   death   is   concerned   it   was   sent   through   Commissioner   of   Police   Surat   on   13.06.2007   were   submitted   to   the   Hon'ble National Human Right Commission New Delhi as  well as the Learned Register High Court of Gujarat   Infrastructure   &   Information   Technology   vide   Javak   No. 1390 of 2007 dated 13.06.2007. 



                                   Page 4 of 5

HC-NIC                          Page 4 of 5      Created On Sun Oct 04 02:07:01 IST 2015
                     R/SCR.A/940/2008                                                ORDER




12. It is further most respectfully submitted that   by   virtue   of   the   amendment   under   section   176   A   of   the Criminal Procedure Code, the magisterial inquiry   came to be conducted by Mr. B.R.Thakker Civil Judge   (S.D.) JMFC and the report came to be submitted vide   report   dated   11.04.2008   to   the   District   Magistrate   through District & Sessions Judge Surat."

The   incident   is   of   the   year   2007.     Having   gone   through   the  materials on record and the papers of the inquiry, it is very difficult to  arrive at a conclusion that the case is one of homicidal death while in the  custody of the Police.

In the aforesaid view of the matter, nothing further is required to  be done or adjudicated.   This application is accordingly disposed of.

(J.B.PARDIWALA, J.) Mohandas Page 5 of 5 HC-NIC Page 5 of 5 Created On Sun Oct 04 02:07:01 IST 2015