Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi

Honorary Naib Subedar Mahipal Singh vs Union Of India Through Secretary on 22 November, 2013

      

  

  

 Central Administrative Tribunal
Principal Bench, New Delhi

O.A.No.2539/2012

Friday, this the 22nd day of November 2013

Honble Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj, Member (J)
Honble Mr. Ashok Kumar, Member (A)

Honorary Naib Subedar Mahipal Singh
Vill Dheerkhera
Post Office Dadri
(Punnchsheel Nagar)
Dist Meerut (UP)
..Applicant
(By Advocate: Mr. Subhash chand Tomar)

Versus

1.	Union of India through Secretary
Ministry of Defence
New Delhi-1

2.	The Chief of Army Staff
Sena Bhawan, New Delhi-1

3.	Quarter Master Generals Branch
Dy Dte Gen Canteen Services
Army Headquarters
L Block, Room No.16
Church Road, New Delhi-1

4.	The General Officer Commanding
Defence Canten Delhi Area
Gopinath Bazar Delhi Cant
New Delhi-10

5.	The Manager
Station Canteen, Delhi Area
Sector 37, Arun Vihar, NOIDA
Dist Goutam Budh Nagar, NOIDA (UP)
..Respondents
(By Advocate: Mr. Ashish for Mr. Ankur Chhibber)

O R D E R (ORAL)

Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj:

In view of the judgment of the Honble Supreme Court in R.R. Pillai (dead) through LRs v. Commanding Officer HQ S.A.C. (U) & others (Civil Appeal No.3495/2005) decided on 28.4.2009 wherein it has been viewed that URCs are not funded from the Consolidated Fund of India and their profits are not credited to said fund but distributed to the non-public fund and these cannot be treated as an instrumentality of the State, learned counsel for applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present Original Application with permission to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievances.

2. The Original Application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty.

( Ashok Kumar )					     ( A.K. Bhardwaj )
Member (A)							 Member (J)

November 22, 2013
/sunil/