Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Prithvi Nath Tiwari And Others vs Union Of India And Others on 4 September, 2013

Author: Rajiv Narain Raina

Bench: Rajiv Narain Raina

                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                                         CHANDIGARH

                                                           CWP No. 24851 of 2012
                                                           Date of Decision: 04.09.2013

                            Prithvi Nath Tiwari and others                          ..... Petitioners

                                                                 Versus

                            Union of India and others                               ..... Respondents


                            CORAM:-             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA

                            Present:           Mr.B.S.Bajwa, Advocate for the petitioners

                                               Mr.Rakesh K.Nagpal, Advocate for respondent-UOI

                                               Mr.G.S.Bal, Advocate for respondents no.3 to 5

                                                                       ...

                                               1. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
                                               2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

                            RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J.

Admittedly, after re-employment in the Northern Railways, the petitioners are claiming fixation of their pay by protecting the total emoluments last drawn by them in the military service. The relief sought involves service matter which falls within the jurisdiction of Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh. Therefore, writ is not maintainable before this Court.

Consequently, this petition is dismissed for want of maintainability. The petitioners would be at liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh by filing Original Application.





                                                                             (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA)
                                                                                    JUDGE
                            04.09.2013
Khan Md. Firoz
2013.09.06 15:51            MFK

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document punjab and haryana high court chandigarh