Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Ramnath Kumar Ray @ Ramnath Rai vs The State Of Bihar on 19 May, 2023

Author: Satyavrat Verma

Bench: Satyavrat Verma

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31034 of 2023
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2023 Thana- MAHINDWARA District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 RAMNATH KUMAR RAY @ RAMNATH RAI son of Ratneshwar Ray @
                 Niteshwar Ray @ Nitte Ray RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KOAHI CHAK
                 RAMPUR HARI P S- MAHINDWARA DISTRICT SITAMARHI
                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                           ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-05-2023

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of six cases.

Allegation is of recovery of 252.25 litres of liquor from an asbestos house at village Koahi.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession. It is further submitted that petitioner came to be implicated based on the confessional Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31034 of 2023(2) dt.19-05-2023 2/2 statement of co-accused Harendra Ray in police custody which does not have any evidentiary value in the eye of law. It is next submitted that petitioner is not the owner of the house and he was implicated falsely by the police because of his antecedent through Harendra Ray.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mahindwara P.S. Case No. 36 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/-

U     T