Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt S J Stella vs Shri Rajesh on 11 April, 2012

Author: Jawad Rahim

Bench: Jawad Rahim

      'N HE FITG.i   jURY flF KARNATAKA AT BANGAL flRf

          DAT"        Z1HE 11               AY OF APR        012



          TIlL              MR               C   JAVA            M

                          .A. No. 1044 OF 2008
BE WhEN:

      SMT.S..SfF     -4


      AGED ABG'        YEARS,
      DAUGH rEf       HRI S.JO IN,
       [SIDINC         150, II     K,
       N)ER' N          G.E
                                                         P        A
         YK                RE                                R
         SREL             MSSO(
ANE

      SHRI RkJt.,F
      cío SHEd '.L    % III
                      --t, i_,,

      AGED A'••              rtARS,
      RESIDIF:(            I. SO
       RESS ;.C           NC.LRSC                K.GF
                                                                 )NDF
             Sr                 At               RI                K




      iwIs ..-;             I           FT_rr  thS i'S"tñ :,F.. 0
i'rA"iN'i F.              •L't  •                      J) I
                                      ':f JLC1'1E-I1T C1ATri
4SE[. fl      -. --          L '' SESSIONS JUDL. k 131 AR Th
 Ri   ijp;   çi            Cjt,IT1TIi'       iHE    PESi'uF)E%
i(     'WLf'e                          ' J'5 ¶,q3rf T(


                                'jT              ii".
             F                                    V
                                 C       1L 1


                                    dca




                a       aed              i               t       rc

    s       e                   it                 aet


        3               a       a                   ti



                                    a          o             o

e               r           t

            C


                                                    0
        1

    a


                    4
                     39                        e       r       t

                                         va               n                ee
                                                                       a
    C           it

                J        sL                                            t

                [                    e                                     Le
c       a           r                                                       t

    d           o            t


                    C.                                                 e
                                                                  '1

            €            r




                                                  f

                                 U
                                4




respondent and questioned him as to how he could declare

she is his wife when he was already married to another

woman.      It is alleged he assured her he would obtain

divorce from his first wife and continued matrimony with

her.   On such assurance, he had intercourse with her and

lived in cohabitation thereafter.


       f) The physical intimacy impregnated her, resulting in

the birth of a girl child on 18.5.1998. Even after the child

was born, he had not divorced his first wife and it is alleged

he failed to take care of her and the new born. When she

reminded him of his promise and declaration about the

marriage, it is alleged he retracted from his earlier stand

and left her in a lurch.


       g) On the basis of these allegations, she sought

prosecution of the respondent for the offence punishable

under Section 493, LP.C.      Cognizance was taken by the

jurisdictional magistrate and accused was summoned to

face trial. He denied the charge.
              F    I        he              th            tao             ppe                  ler                nd

evidence as PW1 and examined Chandiakumar as PW2 and

,injvaca a "Vfl tn suppoit                                     her       charqc.                     Fx.D1 's               tht

                               d                     tcO                 ttt                    ip               le          y

t er dgair t the reaponac t.                                  Re's ondent on his                            art wt           C.

deriving the charge, relied on Exs.D1 to D3.


                           le              tr           ge               sdr                     iee             n

decom.)ananta1d her v tnesse opined t estaF ished tie

charge tnt the offence under Section 493, I.P.C. and

      sequer y Co                         ted           res o dent                            iten               hiri

                          pit              isc         itt               yea                    dt                a

     Rs.5 OOfl•                    This   wac assailed 'n CrI.Apgeai No 40/07


                         lear                           iu                a."                 dth            en

       ( CU              thz               'or          nar                   i    ta           o   E        isti

.Parq. to                 thp uife;ir-               :;n.jer                  '-i•        493           j.ii.          and

.1                      I''        1   ii!'nj    t c '-91:           •    ar;t            ;     'hi--



            4                  I,c                            c           ii:i                lear               SC.

 • •i•,,
            t'.   '--r     •--'      'C..qtS:      t    t'.••    '..                •:'fl4;•fl_    !k:.   •   Jb
                                                                                                                     -lilt-C

      Ii'   V
                         C-'       I      t
                                          •fl'           -t
                                                                         ji          r                       t          I
                                   ola         t ha                sabl.            es                nt

sexual intercourse with ner on the basis of declaration that

F•e   hdd        varrue!         her          nrdinq         tc,        rilfEcti?,,      .d5ton'           I   :d

       ef              Ii              g           ier        t tie                3

      intair bit             R erencc s made by the                            i   to thc evider

on recora to shots complainant had established paternity of

          girl   hldb              totr             St            nsp              edt           was

      ?tI          lh                th            or               ar             ott           vide

t'as required to sustain the charge tjr the offence under

Section 493 Thus he seeks -e';e-sal ot t-h.- juagment nf

          ita          o               €           0


           S 'earned counei for the recpondent has upporred

      'lip'      ocd ju9ment o the aopellat crt


           t                           ic..        bc              de              '-r           ved
• lrricieaT..flu,                csarV:       it   haS      ;fl    pr adrn:'.d cet-p!n.                        '



r   1
    u a     r       'e'
                                 ,
                                 L
                                 1 .
                                                       .    c'fty- rj                  rft       --   •.'       e




                 sat        :r.4'.                         :t---...r-.n        t1'".          "



                             I
                                              :•                   •t     1         •            1.1)
       "i    °ib             ittt                eu                f lymi           C    toh i              the

      von                    jes                    na                  bkd               a                 n

 wnnan wti.
       1               .    hot     iawfulit mar' ied                  tc' him ti-       !,elie e that

che gc lawfully man 'ed tn t
                           iim arc' r robahit r i'ave ,ev.ual

ml         ourse       v lii him                l;t bel                snail           punisi c            wit;

                            Cc
                                                     C                 or          c       it

ec         id to t      ,    veams. and shal also be mable                                        to       me.'

Therefore, to custain thc chdrge undet Section 493, there

must be eroc't that the nan had by deceit maae a woirian

             1                ly                    t
                                                    4                  Lot             ttl             S     i

legaly married to hm                                     an        ohabut               have                ual

 nterrourse in that belief. Tnerero,e, the first aspect to bce

Drcwed is. deceit 'ndu.aed into I                                  the arnsed must -esuit

            wor             •Iuev                                      3b'f             a'r't               er

             ft              €1                     Cu                  hi              ito                  S


      i    shun I,' it- t'..               -L   ,'stan'           -%   ire pin-ed,        Iif      •


,.nanr      C.   tub.. 4's,.        r'          .   ;.   -d &.     rIoifltflr-3J.-



                              1--                                      'p                                    it
                                                     ,
                                                         0                               t-'I.'              I'


:r-               a-        ---
                                    r-..        '            --                -        '•1t
 was married to a woman called Jes'ntha and was living with

he in m3tri nony as hi sbond wh n ne                                          i   al egd to have
oferci               ar,         ie          o         plilc     t.               n-er                       e
"nthnut saying that the complainant was aware that during

th    si    si ten   e      ft   e     e rue n arnag                        be neen           ajesh and
Je intha, she woild not be his leqall                                        n 3rred          'if           The
reievant portion reads thus:

          ungne3            It      Jy, 9        te cied
        and his fnend one Chandrakumar, So.Mani
        -'ent to the house of the comj 'ainant when
          o eo he a ily nenb 5 er preset. le
        offered her a gold finc'er ring and asked her to
        v'ear it As soon as the complainant put the
          nqo ief e t                ociediif 'rid a
        he hdd married her and she became his wife.
       He had also said that puttino ring in front cf a
                ra     i            fm      conan e
         he complainant protested -aid said that since
       he :,aa already mdrred 'ne Jecintna nfl
         o                      h
                                3       ci          a         r
         he dC used oninced net stating tt.af his
       marriage vitl said Jesintha              'as iu' ef
           r                            rot          r        e
             ith c"mjlarr.ant           Itie rCt used hr)
       .rfc,t -nec' h r rF at hi-- •ra r'ed ste i.,4+ ti-c. s'iJ
          sI                1       te      nl
           tiatn,    (134   (tt(       p.irnach.tcj.. 39g.                  ')  F.          . iø
           ',':
           3
           3 ljj dr
                 t
                 3          b."e'er!             tifr'    •-.1ç       :.'   i:: !Jt-f       ?e'j


           r

1
5
H'f                  n'n--               :t   .           ibfl     .,,:sr-r'                                 $e
                                                                                        •    .,       C.,




      ''Fir     '           I      i               .        '.   fl.                              I
  bein. known to her she canrut new put e voIfr                                    fate         t Sy
 she believed she was legally married to him by c-ychapoe of

 'irig


             9   Th.cni                      orsiec              ta      I      e
assuice                )f tIt          esodnt                   hit   ecrar'g              f    mo
completes the pro -e s of r arriag                                    n C'iristi nty             ter
statement that he I-ac' assured her h would obtain divorce

from his first wife                    shows complainant could not h?ve

beliesed herself to be legally marriad to him 'inlesc 'esintha

was dn.orted from the resnondent-Raiesl'.                                    The nature           if

allegations made by the complainant certainly do not come

nthr,        me a. schief of Section 493.                        p (. flicugt   it   may gi'e
"se to a 'narge for                  arw   o'ner ofe',ct. under me Penal Lode
o'    c
      t
      fre         .a                       h'       a. ecef-      'oh.,itat.or,       by        t"e
°.   p' n. r.          r   tfl       ..ss.:!aMe of mr a
                                                      1 ,e ris e                     'iC    ..eit.'i!
     d c-        ,r
                           y     •    r'        •iaj   ,s.v).     rr.?j.             1
                                                                                     i,j,       .,;

't       1        _t       t.e          'r      .   .rJc        n,t0.:   £
                  -'                     n
            0    to   a,          to
                                  -'    0
            --                     (ft   -'
            w    •o              •0
10          -b   0    m           0     t
z.          0     Z               z     •
 *          -'
            z                    z
            o                    ft     D
                                        ft   ft
                 0               a,

                 S    •


                 n
                      2.
                      --

Z a, a, 0

-I u, to 0 -' 10 to mao C C z S 5 0 a, ft3 (flu) C to •0 310 a, a a, U) S a (0 Dft

--. Z 2U) 3 w to S a, 0. n z to 0 a, -, txj' h a, OOft Ca' 3s a, z • ft

0. a, ft ft S S S to 3 to to