Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad
The Dcit, Circle-1(1)(1), Ahmedabad vs M/S. Baheti Metal & Ferro Alloys Ltd., ... on 1 October, 2019
आयकर अपील य अ धकरण, अहमदाबाद यायपीठ - अहमदाबाद ।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
AHMEDABAD - BENCH 'B'
BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND
SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No.2460/AHD/2017
नधा रण वष / Asstt.Year: 2014-2015
DCIT, Cir.1(1)(1) Baheti Metal & Ferro Alloys Ltd.
Ahmedabad. Vs. A-2/3, L.R. Apartment
Opp: Police Commissioners office
Shahibaug, Ahmedabad.
PAN: AAACB 4626 L
(Applicant) (Responent)
Assessee by : Shri P.B. Parmar, AR
Revenue by : Shri Mudit Nagpal, Sr.DR
सन
ु वाई क तार ख/ Dateof Hearing : 27/09/2019
घोषणा क तार ख / Date of Pronouncement: 01/10/2019
आदे श/O R D E R
PER RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal against order of ld.CIT(A)- 1, Ahmedabad dated 30.8.2017 passed for the assessment year 2014-15.
2. The Revenue is aggrieved by the action of the Id.CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance of FCNRB hedging charges of Rs.74,68,104/-
3. At the outset, the Id.counsel for the assessee submitted that the appeal of the Revenue is not maintainable because tax effect on the disputed addition is below Rs.50 lakhs. He submitted that by virtue of recent CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 8.8.2019, Department has been instructed not to file appeal before the Tribunal where tax effect is below Rs.50 lakhs. This instruction is applicable to the pending cases also. Therefore, the present appeal of the Revenue is liable to be dismissed at the threshold. The Id.DR did not dispute applicability of ITA No.2460/Ahd/2017 2 the recent CBDT circular and left to the Tribunal to pass appropriate order in the matter.
4. After hearing both the sides and after perusal of the above CBDT Instruction, we are of the view that the present appeal of the Revenue falls within the purview of the CBDT Instruction cited (supra). It is not disputed by the Revenue that tax effect on the disputed addition is more than Rs.50 lakhs, and therefore, keeping in view the above CBDT circular and provisions of section 268A of the Income Tax Act, we are of the view that the present appeal of the Revenue deserves to be dismissed. It is dismissed.
However, it is observed that at in case on re-verification at the end of the AO it can be demonstrated that the tax effect is more, or Revenue's case falls within the ambit of exceptions provided in the Circular, then the Department will be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for recall of this order. Such application should be filed within the time period prescribed in the Act. In view of the above, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed due to low tax effect.
5. In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed due to low tax effect.
Order pronounced in the Court on 1st October, 2019 at Ahmedabad.
Sd/- Sd/- (AMARJIT SINGH) (RAJPAL YADAV) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER