Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Chairman,Admin.C.C.A.P.Coop.Dairy ... vs G.B.Tewari on 3 December, 2014

Bench: Jagdish Singh Khehar, Arun Mishra

                                                          1



                                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                          CIVIL APPEAL No.4019 OF 2010



     CHAIRMAN,ADMIN.C.C.A.P.COOP.DAIRY FED.LTD                                   .......APPELLANT


                                                     VERSUS


     G.B.TEWARI                                                                  ......RESPONDENT


                                           O    R   D         E    R


                              During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the

     appellant was confronted with the following observations made by

     the High Court in the impugned order:

                                   “We have considered the arguments raised
                              from both the sides and perused the record.
                              There is nothing on record to indicate that the
                              enquiry officer at any point of time, after
                              service of the charge sheet and the reply
                              submitted by the respondent has fixed any date,
                              time and place for holding the enquiry or for
                              adducing the evidence of either parties. In fact
                              only one date, i.e. 19.2.1989 was fixed, which is
                              said to be the date of personal hearing of the
                              respondent, on which date, he was handed over a
                              questionnaire containing 25 questions and was
                              required to answer the questions.    This in our
                              opinion, hardly was a hearing afforded to the
                              respondent, besides the fact that the rules or
                              procedure    for    holding   the    disciplinary
                              proceedings do not envisage any such procedure.”


Signature Not Verified
                              Learned counsel for the appellant could not contradict
Digitally signed by
Satish Kumar Yadav
Date: 2014.12.05

     the
17:25:03 IST
Reason:                  aforesaid   factual   position       on   the   basis   of   the   material

     available on the record of the case. In view of the above, we find

     no merit in the present appeal.
                                2

         The instant appeal is accordingly dismissed.



                                     ...........................J.
                                      (JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR)



                                    ...........................J.
                                     (ARUN MISHRA)
NEW DELHI;
DECEMBER 3, 2014.
                                    3


ITEM NO.105                 COURT NO.5               SECTION XI

                S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                    Civil Appeal No(s).4019/2010

CHAIRMAN,ADMIN.C.C.A.P.COOP.DAIRY FED.LD             Appellant(s)

                                  VERSUS

G.B.TEWARI                                           Respondent(s)

(With office report)

Date : 03/12/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :
          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR
          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

For Appellant(s)       Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Adv.


For Respondent(s)      Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, Adv.
                       Mr.Pawanshree Agarwal, Adv.
                       Mr.Akarsh Garg, Adv.

    Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                        O R D E R

The appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order.




(SATISH KUMAR YADAV)                             (RENUKA SADANA)
   COURT MASTER                                   COURT MASTER

(Signed order is placed on the file)