Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

Noratan Mal Vijay Singh Dhaddha Huf vs Income Tax Officer on 16 March, 2022

Bench: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Sameer Jain

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                                                         BENCH AT JAIPUR

                                                         D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4275/2022
                                      Noratan Mal Vijay Singh Dhaddha Huf, Having Its Office At - 11,
                                      Bardiya    Colony,      Museum        Road,      Jaipur,      302004,   Rajasthan
                                      Through Its Karta Sh. Vijay Singh Dhadda.
                                                                                                           ----Petitioner
                                                                            Versus
                                      Income Tax Officer, Ward - 5(2), Jaipur, New Central Revenue
                                      Building, Bhagwan Das Road, C-Scheme, Jaipur.
                                                                                                         ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Javed Khan Advocate. HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 16/03/2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset would submit that the issue involved in this petition is no longer res integra as it has been put to an end by Division Bench of this Court in the decision rendered on 27.01.2022 in Sudesh Taneja Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3) & Anr. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 969/2022 and batch of petitions) where the notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 have been found to be invalid and impermissible in law and quashed.

In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the impugned notice issued in the present case, for the reasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in the aforesaid cases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition is allowed.

(SAMEER JAIN),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ Sanjay Kumawat-11 (Downloaded on 24/12/2022 at 04:25:15 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)