Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Khodabhai vs State on 28 May, 2008

Author: Rajesh H.Shukla

Bench: R.H.Shukla

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCR.A/1040/2008	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 1040 of 2008
 

 
=================================================
 

KHODABHAI
BABABHAI BHANGI - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 2 - Respondent(s)
 

=================================================
Appearance : 
MR
SL VAISHYA for Applicant(s) : 1, 
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for
Respondent(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) : 2 -
3. 
=================================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE R.H.SHUKLA
		
	

 

Date
: 28/05/2008 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER 

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking direction to the Jail Authorities for releasing his on parole or furlough.

The convict ? prisoner has been convicted for the offence under Section 302, 120(b) and 34 of Indian Penal Code by the judgment and order dated 8.10.2007 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Patan in Sessions Case No.92/2006 and sentenced to imprisonment for life. Though, in the title, the matter refers to the Prisoner's Act, and Bombay Parole and Furlough Act, in the body it refers to temporary bail for 30 days. Again in the prayer clause, it is corrected as Parole and Forlough Act. As the appeal has not been filed, this Court cannot entertain the present application. Learned advocate has therefore submitted today an application dated 26.5.2008, filed before the Jail Superintendent for the same reason for grant of parole and furlough.

As the Court was not inclined, learned advocate Mr.S.L.Vaishya seeks permission to withdraw the present application. Permission is granted. The present petition stands disposed of as withdrawn unconditionally.

[R.H.SHUKLA, J.] binoy*     Top