Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Stanley vs Kishor Kumar on 8 October, 2015

Author: Shaji P. Chaly

Bench: Shaji P.Chaly

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT:

              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

       WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MAY 2016/28TH VAISAKHA, 1938

         Con.Case(C).No. 366 of 2016 ()  IN WP(C).3939/2013
         ---------------------------------------------------

        JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 3939/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA

PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
------------------------

            STANLEY, AGED 54 YEARS
            S/O.HENRY, JACKSON NIVAS, NEENDAKARA, KOLLAM.


            BY ADVS.SRI.V.JAYAPRADEEP
                    SRI.V.JAYADHAR

RESPONDENT(S)/3RD RESPONDENT & ADDL. 5TH RESPONDENT:
----------------------------------------------------

          1. KISHOR KUMAR, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
            PETITIONER
            MANAGING DIRECTOR,
            MATSYAFED, HEAD OFFICE,
            KAMALESWARAM, MANACAUD P.O.,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 009.

          2. CHANRDASENAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
            PETITIONER, MANAGER,
            THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
            BRANCH OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, K.K BUILDINGS,
            ARISTO JUNCTION, THAMPANOOR,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 014.


            R1  BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM
                BY SRI.RAJAN P.KALIYATH

       THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL)  HAVING BEEN FINALLY
       HEARD  ON  18-05-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
       THE FOLLOWING:

ds

Con.Case(C).No. 366 of 2016 IN WP(C).3939/2013



                              APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:


ANNEXURE A1:     COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 3939 OF 2013 DATED
                 8.10.2015 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.

ANNEXURE A2:     COPY OF THE CALL LETTER DATED 18.11.2015 OF THE 1ST
                 RESPONDENT.


RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:       NIL




                            //True copy//


                            P.A. to Judge


ds



                       SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
              - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
            Contempt Case (C) No. 366 of 2016
          - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
           Dated this the 18th day of May, 2016


                         J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the judgment of this Court, namely, Annexure A1 is complied with by the respondents and therefore the contempt is not pressed.

Accordingly, the contempt case is closed.

Sd/-

SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE ds