Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Bombay High Court

Nayan Sanghavi Son Of Ashok N Sanghavi vs The State Of Maharashtra on 14 October, 2019

Author: Revati Mohite Dere

Bench: Revati Mohite Dere

                                                 1/3                       48-ABA-2229-2019.doc


shailaja
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                       ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2229 OF 2019


           Nayan Sanghavi son of Ashok N. Sanghavi                           ]       Applicant
               Versus
           The State of Maharashtra                                          ]       Respondent
                                            .....

           Mr. Veeraj Desai i/b A.S. Khan & Associates, for the Applicant.
           Ms. S.S. Hulke, for the Respondent- State.

           PSI - S.V. Hindlekar, Dindoshi Police Station.
                                              .....


                                               CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
                                               DATE :   14th OCTOBER, 2019.

           P.C. :


           1.                   Heard learned Counsel for the applicant.



           2.                 By this application, the applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in

           connection with C.R. No.397 of 2019, registered with Dindoshi Police

           Station, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 450 and 395 r/w

           section 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code.




                ::: Uploaded on - 16/10/2019                   ::: Downloaded on - 17/10/2019 03:31:17 :::
                                 2/3                         48-ABA-2229-2019.doc


3.             Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that it is alleged by

the complainant- Bharat Mahashankar Bhatt that he had taken a room i.e

Room No.302 in Building No.6/A of Gokuldham, Dhanjiwadi, Malad

(East), Mumbai, on leave and licence basis from the original owner-

Keshubhai Rajput. He submits that the complainant has alleged that 15 to

20 persons ransacked his house and robbed some of his belongings plus the

other belongings kept outside the house. He submits that the C.C.T.V

footage will show that there were only 2 or 3 persons who had gone to

complainant's house.


4.             Learned APP seeks time to verify C.C.T.V footage.


5.             In the meantime, till the next date, the applicant is granted

interim protection on the following terms and conditions :-


                                      ORDER

(i) In the event of the arrest, the applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/-, with one or two sureties in the like amount ;

::: Uploaded on - 16/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 17/10/2019 03:31:17 :::
                                 3/3                         48-ABA-2229-2019.doc


      (ii)     The applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer of the

concerned Police Station on 16th and 17th October, 2019, between 10.00 a.m. and 1.00 noon, and thereafter as and when called;

6. Stand over to 18th November, 2019. To be placed on the Supplementary Board.

7. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

[REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] ::: Uploaded on - 16/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 17/10/2019 03:31:17 :::