Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

K.Saroja vs The Director General on 28 November, 2018

Author: S.Vimala

Bench: S.Vimala

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                    DATED : 28.11.2018
                                                           CORAM
                                          THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA
                                                   W.P.No.31318 of 2018


                 K.Saroja                                                       ....   Petitioner
                                             Vs


                 1.The Director General, Highways Department
                   HRS Campus, Chennai 600 025.
                 2.The Accountant General (A&E)
                   No.361, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018.
                 3.The Principal Chief Engineer (Gen)
                   Highways Department, Guindy
                   Chennai 600 025.
                 4.The Superintending Engineer (C&M)
                   Highways Department, Teynampet,
                   Chennai 600 018.
                 5.The Divisional Engineer (C&M)
                   Highways Department, Thiruvallur Division
                   Thiruvallur.
                 6.The Assistant Divisional Engineer
                   Highways (Construction & Maintenance)
                  Thiruvallur Sub Division, Thiruvallur.                        ...    Respondents

                                      For Petitioner              :      Mr.A.Subramani
                                      For Respondent              :      Mr.A.N.Thambidurai
                                                                         Special Government Pleader


                 Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of

                 Mandamus directing the respondents to commutation the pension of the husband of the

                 petitioner, based on the representation of the petitioner dated 29.6.2018 again on

                 20.07.2018 in accordance with the Tamil Nadu Civil Pensions (Commutation) Rules

                 1944 and pay the commutation pension benefits to the petitioner herein.




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                            ORDER

                          The petitioner's husband served as Gangman Mazdoor (Special Grade) in the

                 Highways Department and retired on 31.10.2017 and he died on 28.12.2017. The

                 grievance of the petitioner is that the pension proposals of the petitioner's husband

                 Gunachandran has not yet been processed by the respondents. In this regard, she has

                 sent representations to the respondents on 29.6.2018 again on 20.07.2018. As the

                 same has not been considered, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.



                          2. The petitioner claims that her representation has to be considered in terms of

                 Tamil Nadu Civil Pension (Commutation) Rules 1944. The petitioner also relies upon

                 Rule 9(1) (ii) of the Tamil Nadu Civil Pension Commutation Rules, which reads as

                 under...



                          “9(1)(ii) Commutation shall become absolute on the date of

                          application by the retiring government servant on the day following

                          the date of his retirement whichever is later.”



                          3. Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on

                 behalf of the respondents.        Heard the contentions of both sides and perused the

                 materials placed on record.



                          4. In view of the limited relief sought for, this Court is of the view that it is not

                 necessary to dwell into the merits of the issue, but it would be suffice to direct the


http://www.judis.nic.in
                 respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 29.06.2018 and

                 20.07.2018, and pass orders on the same within a particular time frame


                          4. Under the circumstances, the respondents are directed to consider the

                 representation of the petitioner dated 29.06.2018 and 20.07.2018 in the light of the rules

                 quoted in paragraph 2 supra and pass orders thereon,within a period of eight weeks

                 from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law.        The writ

                 petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.


                                                                                               28-11-2018
                 kst



                 To

                 1.The Director General, Highways Department
                   HRS Campus, Chennai 600 025.
                 2.The Accountant General (A&E)
                   No.361, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018.
                 3.The Principal Chief Engineer (Gen)
                   Highways Department, Guindy
                   Chennai 600 025.
                 4.The Superintending Engineer (C&M)
                   Highways Department, Teynampet,
                   Chennai 600 018.
                 5.The Divisional Engineer (C&M)
                   Highways Department, Thiruvallur Division
                   Thiruvallur.
                 6.The Assistant Divisional Engineer
                   Highways (Construction & Maintenance)
                  Thiruvallur Sub Division, Thiruvallur.




http://www.judis.nic.in
                              DR.S.VIMALA, J.

KST W.P.No.31318 of 2018 28.11.2018 http://www.judis.nic.in