Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 569]

Chattisgarh High Court

Sandeep Kumar Agrawal vs State Of Chhattisgarh 2 Ma/50/2015 ... on 16 May, 2018

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                                       1

                                                                                      NAFR

                         HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                     Writ Petition (C) No. 1411 of 2018

                    Sandeep Kumar Agrawal, S/o Shri Abhimanyu Prasad Agrawal, aged about
                    49 years, R/o Near Agrawal Medical Store, Hatri Bazar Chowk, Dhamdha,
                    District Durg (C.G.)                                     ---- Petitioner

                                                   Versus

                1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Health and Family
                   Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur
                   (C.G.)

                2. Chief Medical Officer, Durg, District Durg (C.G.)

                3. Registrar, Chhattisgarh Ayurvedic Tatha Unani Chikitsa Paddhati and
                   Prakirtik Chikitsa Board, Raipur (C.G.)             ---- Respondents

For Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondents/ State : Mr. D. R. Minj, Dy. G. A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 16/05/18

1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that petitioner has made an application for issuance of license for practicing Ayurvedic medicine under the Chhattisgarh State Upcharyagriha Tatha Rogopchar Sambandhi Sthapanaye Anugyapan Adhiniyam, 2010 which is pending consideration before the respondent No. 2 since 17.08.2017 and has not been decided till date.

2. Be that as it may, the respondent No. 2 is directed to consider and dispose of the petitioner's said application expeditiously, preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

3. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

SD/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka