Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court of India

Ravinder Kaur vs Gagandeep Singh on 6 September, 2018

Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2018 SC 1137, AIRONLINE 2018 SC 158

Author: Kurian Joseph

Bench: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Kurian Joseph

                                                              1

                                                                                              NON-REPORTABLE

                                          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                           CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 9167-9168 OF 2018
                          [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 15872-15873 OF 2016]

                         RAVINDER KAUR                                                      Appellant(s)

                                                            VERSUS

                         GAGANDEEP SINGH                                                    Respondent(s)

                                                     J U D G M E N T

KURIAN, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The parties have been in litigation for more than two decades. Having sensed that there is an element of settlement, this Court passed the following order on 04.07.2016 :-

“Heard learned senior counsel on both sides.
                                  We     are    of    the   view     that      the    minor
                                 difference         of    opinion     between         close
                                 family        members       should       be     settled
amicably and we see no reason why it could not be settled amicably with a solution as acceptable to both sides. We are sure that learned senior counsel would be in a position to find out such a solution.
Signature Not Verified
In that view, we request the High Court to defer the hearing which is now Digitally signed by JAYANT KUMAR ARORA Date: 2018.09.08 12:46:53 IST Reason: slated to 7th July, 2016. Post on 8th July, 2016.” 2

3. Thereafter, on 08.07.2016, the parties were referred to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre. The parties were still unable to reach a settlement. Thereafter, when the matter came up to this Court on 20.03.2017, after hearing the learned counsel, we requested Sh. Gopal Subramaniam, learned senior counsel, to make another attempt to purchase peace between the parties. The learned senior counsel graciously accepted the request. It is reported that there were other litigations between the parties and thanks to the cooperation extended by them, all the disputes have been amicably settled. The learned mediator has submitted a comprehensive report dated 05.09.2018. The report shall form part of this Judgment.

4. These appeals are disposed of in terms of the settlement as recorded at paragraph 20 of the Report, which is acceptable to both the parties. All other litigations referred to in Paragraph 14 are also disposed of in terms of the settlement, as indicated in the Report of the learned mediator. The settlement shall form part of the decree.

5. We make it clear that the payments referred to in Paragraph 20 of the Terms of Settlement, being part of a partition among the members of the family, shall not attract any tax by way of capital gains. 3

6. We record our sincere appreciation for the strenuous efforts taken by Sh. Gopal Subramaniam, learned senior counsel, who has spent months’ long discussions with the parties and was finally able to persuade the parties to settle all the disputes between them. We also record our appreciation for the support given and the positive approach taken by the parties and their respective counsel.

.......................J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ] .......................J. [ SANJAY KISHAN KAUL ] New Delhi;

September 06, 2018.