Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

K.P.Babu vs M/S.Shriram Transport Finance Company ...

Author: K. Harilal

Bench: K.Harilal

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                         PRESENT:

           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL

   MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/6TH ASHADHA, 1938

               OP(C).No. 1531 of 2016 (O)
               ---------------------------
        OP(ARB)647/2014 of I ADDL. DISTRICT COURT,
                        ERNAKULAM
                      ----------

   PETITIONER(S):
   -------------

          K.P.BABU, S/O.PATHROSE,
          RESIDING AT ADVENTIST HOUSE,
          THAZHAVA P.O, KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK,
          KOLLAM DISTRICT.

         BY ADVS.SRI.G.HARIHARAN
                 SRI.PRAVEEN.H.
                 SMT.A.ANJANA
                 SMT.T.T.SHANIBA

   RESPONDENT(S):
   --------------

          M/S.SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LTD.
         [FORMERLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM INVESTMENTS LTD],
         NAZEEMA COMPLEX, HOSPITAL ROAD, KOLLAM,
         REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE
         VIMAL KRISHNAN B.S.



     THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
     ON 27-06-2016,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
     THE FOLLOWING:

bp

OP(C).No. 1531 of 2016 (O)
---------------------------

                           APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------

EXHIBIT P1:     COPY OF THE AWARD PASSED BY THE SOLE
                ARBITRATOR IN CONNECTION WITH A.C NO.37/2007
                DATED 29.5.14.

EXHIBIT P2:     COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF ORIGINAL PETITION
                FILED UNDER SECTION 34 OF THE ARBITRATION AND
                CONCILIATION ACT 1996.

EXHIBIT P3:     COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED ON 3.7.14
                ALONG WITH EXHIBIT P2 ORIGINAL PETITION BEFORE
                THE DISTRICT COURT, ERNAKULAM.

EXHIBIT P4:     COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE
                PETITIONER FOR CALLING THE RECORDS.

EXHIBIT P5:     COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED FROM THE DISTRICT
                COURT, KOLLAM EP NO. 511/2014 IN AC NO.37/2014
                UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 37 OF THE CPC.

EXHIBIT P6:     COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 1.12.12 ISSUED
                BY THE JOINT RTO, KARUNAGAPPALLY.

EXHIBIT P7:     COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGMENT MADE IN WA 553/13
                AND WPC 10529/15 MADE ON 8.6.15.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS   :     NIL.


                                          //TRUE COPY//


                                          P.A.TO JUDGE

bp



                       K. HARILAL, J.
      ------------------------------------------------------
             O.P. (C) No. 1531 of 2016-O
      ------------------------------------------------------
          Dated this the 27th day of June, 2016

                        JUDGMENT

The petitioner herein is the 1st respondent in O.P. (Arb) No.647/2014 filed before the District Court-II, Ernakulam, challenging an award passed by the Arbitrator in Arb. Case No.37/2007. In the meantime, the respondent filed E.P.No.511/2014 in A.C. No.37/2007 seeking execution of the award. Even though the petitioner had filed Ext.P3 petition for stay of execution proceedings, as early as on 3/7/2014 in he O.P. (Arb) No.647/2014, the same has not been considered so far. The grievance of the petitioner is that if the award is executed in E.P.No.511/2014, the reliefs sought for in the O.P. (Arb) No.647/2014 will become infructuous and thereby, the petitioner will be O.P. (C) No. 1531 of 2016 -: 2 :- put to irreparable injury and great loss. Hence the petitioner sought for a direction to the court to keep the execution proceedings in abeyance till the disposal of O.P. (Arb) No.647/2014 by the District Court-II, Ernakulam.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. According to the petitioner, he has filed O.P. (Arb) No.647/2014 challenging the award passed in A.C. No.37/2007 and filed Ext.P3 petition as early as on 3/7/2014; but the same has not been considered so far. As rightly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, if the award is executed in E.P.No.511/2014, O.P. (Arb) No.647/2014 will become infructuous.

4. Having regard to the said fact, the District Court-II, Ernakulam, is directed to dispose of O.P. (Arb) No.647/2014, within a period of four months from today and all further proceedings in E.P.No.511/2014 in A.C.No.37/2007 on the files of the Principal District Court, Kollam, shall be kept in abeyance till the O.P. (C) No. 1531 of 2016 -: 3 :- disposal of O.P. (Arb) No.647/2014.

This Original Petition (Civil) is disposed of accordingly.

Sd/-

(K. HARILAL, JUDGE) Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge