Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Chattisgarh High Court

Kusum Sharma vs State Of Chhattisgarh 5 Wp227/707/2018 ... on 1 October, 2018

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                                      1

                                                                                             NAFR

                        HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                          W.P. (227) No. 627 of 2018

                   Kusum Sharma W/o Dr. P. Sharma, aged about 50 years, R/o H. No. MIG
                   80, Post Tatibandh, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)   ---- Petitioner

                                                   Versus

                1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

                2. Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Division-I, Raipur,
                   District Raipur (C.G.)

                3. Smt. Vandana Sharma, W/o Dharmendra Sharma, aged about 45 years,
                   R/o H.No. MIG 80, Post Tatibandha, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

                4. Devshri Sharma D/o Purushottam Sharma, aged about 43 years, R/o H.No.
                   MIG 80, Post Tatibandha, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

                5. Archana Sharma, D/o Purushottam Sharma, aged about 40 years, R/o
                   H.No. MIG 80, Post Tatibandha, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
                                                                           ---- Respondents

For Petitioner : Mr. Pawan Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Adhiraj Surana, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 01/10/2018

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law.

2. The prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner.

4. Certified copy of the impugned order be returned to counsel for the petitioner on furnishing attested copy thereof.

Sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka