Karnataka High Court
Manjappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2020
Author: P.S.Dinesh Kumar
Bench: P.S. Dinesh Kumar
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO.327/2020 (CS-EL/M)
BETWEEN:
1. MANJAPPA
S/O KANNAPPA KARADI
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
R/O TALAGUPPA VILLAGE AND POST
SAGARA TALUK-577 401
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT
2. KANLERAMAPPA
S/O MALLOAPPA HUNASURU
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
R/O MARATHURU
SAGARA TALUK-577 401
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI S V PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) - V/C
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPEARTION
M S BUILDING
DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BENGALURU-01
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
2
2. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETIES,
BENGALURU DIVISION,
NO.18, CHAMARAJAPETE,
BENGALURU-560 018.
3. DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETIES,
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577201.
4. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
SAGAR SUB-DIVISION,
SAGAR-577 401,
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT.
5. THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE
ELECTION AUTHORITY,
3RD FLOOR, TTMC 'A' BLOCK
SHANTHINAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 027
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
6. PRATHAMIKA KRUSHI PATTINA
SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITHA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
THALAGUPPA,
SAGARA TALUK
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577 401.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. SHARADAMBA A.R., AGA FOR R1 TO R4;
SRI G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R5;
R6 - SERVED)
3
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE
THAT SECTION 20(2) (a-iv) AND (a-v) THE KARNATAKA CO-
OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT 1959 IS ULTRA VIRES THE
LEGISLATIVE COMPETENCE AND ARTICLES 243ZI AND 243ZO
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard Shri. S. V. Prakash, learned advocate for the petitioners, Smt. Sharadamba A. R, learned AGA for the State and Shri G.V.Shashi Kumar, learned advocate for respondent No.5.
2. Shri. S. V. Prakash, learned advocate submits that elections have been conducted. Therefore, this petition is rendered infructuous and accordingly prayed for its dismissal. He undertakes to send a memo to this effect. Once the memo is received, the Registry shall keep the same in the record. 4
3. In the circumstances, the petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
No costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE VP