Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

K.G.Rajasekharan Pillai vs M.A Ramarajan on 27 June, 2024

Author: P.B.Suresh Kumar

Bench: P.B.Suresh Kumar

                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
           Thursday, the 27th day of June 2024 / 6th Ashadha, 1946
                              MJC NO. 50 OF 2017
                AR 26/2016 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
APPLICANTS:

     K.G. RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI, S/O. GOPALAPILLA, SOUPARNIKA-28,
     RIVERDALE, EROOR P.O., COCHIN - 682306.

    BY ADV. MOOSA E.S.
OPPOSITE PARTIES:

  1. M.A. RAMARAJAN, S/O. ACHUTHAN, MATHURAKUNNEL (H), NADUKANI P.O.,
     KOTHAMANGALAM - 686691, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
  2. M.A. VIDHYADARAN, S/O. ACHUTHAN, MATHURAKUNNEL (H), NADUKANI P.O.,
     KOTHAMANGALAM - 686691, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
  3. K.P. PUSHPAVALLY, W/O. M.A. RAMARAJAN, S/O. ACHUTHAN, MATHURAKUNNEL
     (H), NADUKANI P.O., KOTHAMANGALAM - 686691, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

    BY ADVS. M.R. MINI, K. RAMACHANDRAN

     This Miscellaneous jurisdiction case having come up for orders on
27.06.2024, upon perusing this Court's order dated 09.01.2017, the court
on the same day passed the following:
                                         P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
                               -----------------------------------------------
                                        M.J.C No.50 of 2017
                                                     in
                               Arbitration Request No.26 of 2016
                               -----------------------------------------------
                             Dated this the 27th day of June, 2024



                                                ORDER

Having regard to the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the MJC, I deem it appropriate to set aside the order dismissing the arbitration request for default. Accordingly, the MJC is allowed and the arbitration request is restored to file.

Registry is directed to list the arbitration request for hearing as per roster.

Sd/-

P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.

YKB 27-06-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar